so that there was no longer any object in admitting Kentucky to membership, and Congress thereupon very wisely refused to act further in the matter.  Unfortunately Brown, who was the Kentucky delegate in Congress, was one of the separatist leaders.  He wrote home an account of the matter, in which he painted the refusal as due to the jealousy felt by the East for the West.  As a matter of fact the delegates from all the States, except Virginia, had concurred in the action taken.  Brown suppressed this fact, and used language carefully calculated to render the Kentuckians hostile to the Union.

Naturally all this gave an impetus to the separatist movement.  The district held two conventions, in July and again in November, during the year 1788; and in both of them the separatist leaders made determined efforts to have Kentucky forthwith erect herself into an independent state.  In uttering their opinions and desires they used vague language as to what they would do when once separated from Virginia.  It is certain that they bore in mind at the time at least the possibility of separating outright from the Union and entering into a close alliance with Spain.  The moderate men, headed by those who were devoted to the national idea, strenuously opposed this plan; they triumphed and Kentucky merely sent a request to Virginia for an act of separation in accordance with the recommendations of Congress. [Footnote:  See Marshall and Green for this year.]

    The Kentucke Gazette.

It was in connection with these conventions that there appeared the first newspaper ever printed in this new west; the west which lay no longer among the Alleghanies, but beyond them.  It was a small weekly sheet called the Kentucke Gazette, and the first number appeared in August, 1787.  The editor and publisher was one John Bradford, who brought his printing press down the river on a flat-boat; and some of the type were cut out of dogwood.  In politics the paper sided with the separatists and clamored for revolutionary action by Kentucky. [Footnote:  Durrett Collection, Kentucke Gazette, September 20, 1788.]

    Failure of the Separatist Movement.

The purpose of the extreme separatist was, unquestionably, to keep Kentucky out of the Union and turn her into a little independent nation,—­a nation without a present or a future, an English-speaking Uraguay or Ecuador.  The back of this separatist movement was broken by the action of the fall convention of 1788, which settled definitely that Kentucky should become a state of the Union.  All that remained was to decide on the precise terms of the separation from Virginia.  There was at first a hitch over these, the Virginia Legislature making terms to which the district convention of 1789 would not consent; but Virginia then yielded the points in dispute, and the Kentucky convention of 1790 provided for the admission of the state to the Union in 1792, and for holding a constitutional convention to decide upon the form of government, just before the admission. [Footnote:  Marshall, i., 342 etc.]