movements generally, and was unwearied in drilling and disciplining his men.  Not only was he an able leader, but he was also a finished horseman, and the best marksman with both pistol and rifle in the British army.  Being of quick, inventive mind, he constructed a breech-loading rifle, which he used in battle with deadly effect.  This invention had been one of the chief causes of his being brought into prominence in the war against America, for the British officers especially dreaded the American sharpshooters. [Footnote:  Ferguson’s “Memoir,” p. 11.] It would be difficult to imagine a better partisan leader, or one more fitted by his feats of prowess and individual skill, to impress the minds of his followers.  Moreover, his courtesy stood him in good stead with the people of the country; he was always kind and civil, and would spend hours in talking affairs over with them and pointing out the mischief of rebelling against their lawful sovereign.  He soon became a potent force in winning the doubtful to the British side, and exerted a great influence over the tories; they gathered eagerly to his standard, and he drilled them with patient perseverance.

After the taking of Charleston Ferguson’s volunteers and Tarleton’s legion, acting separately or together, speedily destroyed the different bodies of patriot soldiers.  Their activity and energy was such that the opposing commanders seemed for the time being quite unable to cope with them, and the American detachments were routed and scattered in quick succession. [Footnote:  “History of the Campaigns of 1780 and 1781,” Lt.-Col.  Tarleton, London (1787).  See also the “Strictures” thereon, by Roderick Mackenzie, London, same date.] On one of these occasions, the surprise at Monk’s Corners, where the American commander, Huger, was slain, Ferguson’s troops again had a chance to show their skill in the use of the bayonet.

Tarleton did his work with brutal ruthlessness; his men plundered and ravaged, maltreated prisoners, outraged women, and hung without mercy all who were suspected of turning from the loyalist to the whig side.  His victories were almost always followed by massacres; in particular, when he routed with small loss a certain Captain Buford, his soldiers refused to grant quarter, and mercilessly butchered the beaten.  Americans. [Footnote:  It is worth while remembering that it was not merely the tories who were guilty of gross crimes; the British regulars, including even some of their officers, often behaved with abhorrent brutality.]

Ferguson, on the contrary, while quite as valiant and successful a commander, showed a generous heart, and treated the inhabitants of the country fairly well.  He was especially incensed at any outrage upon women, punishing the offender with the utmost severity, and as far as possible he spared his conquered foes.  Yet even Ferguson’s tender mercies must have seemed cruel to the whigs, as may be judged by the following extract from a diary kept by one