These bands of rescuers reached Bryan’s Station on the afternoon of the day the Indians had left.  The men thus gathered were the very pick of the Kentucky pioneers; sinewy veterans of border strife, skilled hunters and woodsmen, long wonted to every kind of hardship and danger.  They were men of the most dauntless courage, but unruly and impatient of all control.  Only a few of the cooler heads were willing to look before they leaped; and even their chosen and trusted leaders were forced to advise and exhort rather than to command them.  All were eager for battle and vengeance, and were excited and elated by the repulse that had just been inflicted on the savages; and they feared to wait for Logan lest the foe should escape.  Next morning they rode out in pursuit, one hundred and eighty-two strong, all on horseback, and all carrying long rifles.  There was but one sword among them, which Todd had borrowed from Boon—­a rough weapon, with short steel blade and buckhorn hilt.  As with most frontier levies, the officers were in large proportion; for, owing to the system of armed settlement and half-military organization, each wooden fort, each little group of hunters or hard-fighting backwoods farmers, was forced to have its own captain, lieutenant, ensign, and sergeant. [Footnote:  For the American side of the battle of Blue Licks I take the contemporary reports of Boon, Levi Todd, and Logan, Va.  State Papers, Vol.  III., pp. 276, 280, 300, 333.  Boon and Todd both are explicit that there were one hundred and eighty-two riflemen, all on horseback, and substantially agree as to the loss of the frontiersmen.  Later reports underestimate both the numbers and loss of the whites.  Boon’s Narrative, written two years after the event, from memory, conflicts in one or two particulars with his earlier report.  Patterson, writing long afterwards, and from memory, falls into gross errors, both as to the number of troops and as to some of them being on foot; his account must be relied on chiefly for his own adventures.  Most of the historians of Kentucky give the affair very incorrectly.  Butler follows Marshall; but from the Clark papers he got the right number of men engaged.  Marshall gives a few valuable facts; but he is all wrong on certain important points.  For instance, he says Todd hurried into action for fear Logan would supersede him in the command; but in reality Todd ranked Logan.  McClung’s ornate narrative, that usually followed, hangs on the very slenderest thread of truth; it is mainly sheer fiction.  Prolix, tedious Collins follows the plan he usually does when his rancorous prejudices do not influence him, and presents half a dozen utterly inconsistent accounts, with no effort whatever to reconcile them.  He was an industrious collector of information, and gathered an enormous quantity, some of it very useful; he recorded with the like complacency authentic incidents of the highest importance and palpable fabrications or irrelevant trivialities; and it never entered his head to sift evidence or to exercise a little critical power and judgment.]