[120] Alone among the Hairy Ainu, 140-41.

[121] Culturgeschichte des Orients, II, 109.

[122] Journal des Goncourt, Tome V. 328-29.

[123] Trans.  Ethn.  Soc.  N.S., II, 292.

[124] Ross Cox, cited by Yarrow in his valuable article on Mortuary Customs of North American Indians, I, Report Bur.  Ethnol., 1879-80.  See also Ploss-Bartels, II., 507-13; Westermarck, 126-28; Letourneau, Chap.  XV., where many other cases are cited.

[125] Trans.  Ninth Internal.  Congr. of Orientalists, London, 1893, p. 781.

[126] Details and authorities in Ploss-Bartels, II., 514-17; Westermarck, 125-26; Letourneau, Chap.  XV.

[127] For many other cases see references in footnotes 3 and 4, Westermarck, 378.

[128] The poets and a certain class of novelists also like to dwell on the love-matches among peasants as compared with commercial city marriages.  As a matter of fact, in no class do sordid pecuniary matters play so great a role as among peasants. (Cf. Grosse. F.d.F., 16.)

[129] Princ. of Soc., American Edition, pp. 756, 772, 784, 787.

[130] The proofs of man’s universal contempt for woman are to be found in the chapter on “Adoration,” and everywhere in this book.  Many additional illustrations are contained in several articles by Crawley in the Jour.  Anthrop.  Inst., Vol.  XXIV.

[131] Cf.  Ploss-Bartels, I., 471-87, where this topic of infant marriage is treated with truly German thoroughness and erudition.

[132] To demonstrate the recklessness (to use a mild word) of Darwin and Westermarck in this matter I will quote the exact words of Burchell in the passage referred to (II., 58-59):  “These men generally take a second wife as soon as the first becomes somewhat advanced in years.”  “Most commonly” the girls are betrothed when about seven years old, and in two or three years the girl is given to the man.  “These bargains are made with her parents only, and without ever consulting the wishes (even if she had any) of the daughter.  When it happens, which is not often the case, that a girl has grown up to womanhood without having been betrothed, her lover must gain her approbation as well as that of her parents.”

[133] Darwin was evidently puzzled by the queer nature of Reade’s evidence in other matters (D.M., Chap.  XIX.); yet he naively relies on him as an authority.  Reade told him that the ideas of negroes on beauty are “on the whole, the same as ours.”  Yet in several other pages of Darwin we see it noted that according to Reade, the negroes have a horror of a white skin and admire a skin in proportion to its blackness; that “they look on blue eyes with aversion, and they think our noses too long and our lips too thin.”  “He does not think it probable,” Darwin adds, “that negroes would ever prefer the most beautiful European woman, on the mere ground of physical admiration, to a good-looking negress.”  How extraordinarily like our taste!  If a man had talked to Darwin about corals or angleworms as foolishly and inconsistently as Reade did about negroes, he would have ignored him.  But in matters relating to beauty or love all rubbish is accepted, and every globe-trotter and amateur explorer who wields a pen is treated as an authority.