he was her heart’s desire and long she had waited for him.  But Maluafiti frowned and would return to his island, and off he went with his sisters.  Sina cried and screamed, and determined to follow swimming.  The sisters pleaded to save and to bring her, but Maluafiti relented not and Sina died in the ocean.

PERSONAL CHARMS OF SOUTH SEA ISLANDERS

“Falling in love” with a person of the other sex on the mere report of his or her beauty is a very familiar motive in the literature of Oriental and mediaeval nations in particular.  It is, therefore, interesting to find such a motive in the Samoan story just cited.  In my view, as previously explained, beauty, among the lower races, means any kind of attractiveness, sensual more frequently than esthetic.  The South Sea Islanders have been credited with considerable personal charms, although it is now conceded that the early voyagers (to whom, after an absence from shore of several months, almost any female must have seemed a Helen) greatly exaggerated their beauty.

Captain Cook kept a level head.  He found Tongan women less distinguished from the men by their features than by their forms, while in the case of Hawaiians even the figures were remarkably similar (II., 144, 246).  In Tahitian women he saw “all those delicate characteristics which distinguish them from the men in other countries.”  The Hawaiians, though far from being ugly, are “neither remarkable for a beautiful shape, nor for striking features” (246).

The indolent, open-air, amphibious life led by the South Sea Islanders was favorable to the development of fine bodies.  Cook saw among the Tongans “some absolutely perfect models of the human figure.”  But fine feathers do not make fine birds.  The nobler phases of love are not inspired by fine figures so much as by beautiful and refined faces.  Polynesian and Melanesian features are usually coarse and sensual.  Hugo Zoller says that “the most beautiful Samoan woman would stand comparison at best with a pretty German peasant girl;” and from my own observations at Honolulu, and a study of many photographs, I conclude that what he says applies to the Pacific Islanders in general.  Edward Reeves, in his recent volume on Brown Men and Women (17-22), speaks of “that fraud—­the beautiful brown woman.”  He found her a “dream of beauty and refinement” only in the eyes of poets and romancers; in reality they were malodorous and vulgar.  “All South Sea Island women are very much the same.”

“To compare the prettiest Tongan, Samoan, Tahitian, or even Rotuman, to the plainest and most simply educated Irish, French, or Colonial girl that has been decently brought up is an insult to one’s intelligence.”

Wilkes (II., 22) hesitated to speak of the Tahitian females because he could not discover their much-vaunted beauty: 

“I did not see among them a single woman whom I could call handsome.  They have, indeed, a soft sleepiness about the eyes, which may be fascinating to some, but I should rather ascribe the celebrity their charms have obtained among navigators to their cheerfulness and gaiety.  Their figures are bad, and the greater part of them are parrot-toed.”

TAHITIANS AND THEIR WHITE VISITORS