Thus the woman becomes the man’s slave—­his property in every sense of the word.  No matter how he obtained her—­by capture, elopement, or exchange for another woman—­she is his own, as much as his spear or his boomerang.  “The husband is the absolute owner of the wife,” says Curr (I., 109).  To cite Eyre once more (318): 

“Wives are considered the absolute property of the husband, and can be given away, or exchanged, or lent, according to his caprice.  A husband is denominated in the Adelaide dialect, Yongarra, Martanya (the owner or proprietor of a wife).”

A whole chapter in sociology is sometimes summed up in a word, as we see in this case.  Another instance is the word gramma, concerning which we read in Lumholtz (126): 

“The robbery of women, who also among these savages are regarded as a man’s most valuable property, is both the grossest and the most common theft; for it is the usual way of getting a wife.  Hence woman is the chief cause of disputes. Inchastity, which is called gramma, i.e., to steal, also falls under the head of theft.”

Here we have a simple and concise explanation of Australian jealousy.  The native knows jealousy in its crudest form—­that of mere animal rage at being prevented by a rival from taking immediate possession of the object of his desire.  He knows also the jealousy of property—­i.e., revenge for infringement on it.  Of this it is needless to give examples.  But he knows not true jealousy—­i.e., anxious concern for his wife’s chastity and fidelity, since he is always ready to barter these things for a trifle.  Proofs of this have already been adduced in abundance.  Here is another authoritative statement by the missionary Schurmann, who writes (223): 

“The loose practices of the aborigines, with regard to the sanctity of matrimony, form the worst trait in their character; although the men are capable of fierce jealousy if their wives transgress unknown to them, yet they frequently send them out to other parties, or exchange with a friend for a night; and, as for near relatives, such as brothers, it may almost be said that they have their wives in common.”

An incident related by W.H.  Leigh (152) shows in a startling way that among the Australians jealousy means nothing more than a desire for revenge because of infringement on property rights: 

“A chief discovered that one of his wives had been sinning, and called a council, at which it was decided that the criminal should be sacrificed, or the adulterous chief give a victim to appease the wrathful husband.  This was agreed to and he gave one of his wives, who was immediately escorted to the side of the river ... and there the ceremony was preluded by a war-song, and the enraged chief rushed upon the innocent and unfortunate victim—­bent down her head upon her chest, whilst another thrust the pointed