If even within the sphere of romantic love no two cases are exactly alike, how could love before marriage be the same as after marriage when so many new experiences, ideas, and associations come into play? Above all, the feelings relating to the children bring an entirely new group of tones into the complex harmony of affection. The intimacies of married life, the revelation of characteristics undiscovered before marriage, the deeper sympathy, the knowledge that theirs is “one glory an’ one shame”—these and a hundred other domestic experiences make romantic love undergo a change into something that may be equally rich and strange but is certainly quite different. A wife’s charms are different from a girl’s and inspire a different kind of love. The husband loves
Those virtues which,
before untried,
The wife has added to
the bride,
as Samuel Bishop rhymes it. In their predilection for maidens, poets, like novelists, have until recently ignored the wife too much. But Cowper sang:
What is there in the
vale of life
Half so delightful as
a wife,
When friendship, love
and peace combine
To stamp the marriage
bond divine?
The stream of pure and
genuine love
Derives its current
from above;
And earth a second Eden
shows,
Where’er the healing
water flows.
Some of the specifically romantic ingredients of love, on the other hand—adoration, hyperbole, the mixed moods of hope and despair—do not normally enter into conjugal affection. No one would fail to see the absurdity of a husband’s exclaiming
O that I were a glove
upon that hand
That I might touch that
cheek.
He may touch that cheek, and kiss it too—and that makes a tremendous difference in the tone and tension of his feelings. Unlike the lover, the husband does not think, feel, and speak in perpetual hyperboles. He does not use expressions like “beautiful tyrant, fiend angelical,” or speak of