“The enraged multitude did not wait for the slow process of law, but put the offender to death with their own hands.”  At the same time some animals “which were deemed divinities in one home, were treated as nuisances and destroyed in others.” (Kendrick, II., I-21.)

EVOLUTION OF SYMPATHY

If we study the evolution of human sympathy we find that it begins, not in reference to animals but to human beings.  The first stage is a mother’s feeling going out to her child.  Next, the family as a whole is included, and then the tribe.  An Australian kills, as a matter of course, everyone he comes across in the wilderness not belonging to his tribe.  To the present day race hatred, jingoism, and religious differences obstruct the growth of cosmopolitan sympathy such as Christ demanded.  His religion has done much, however, to widen the circle of sympathy and to make known its ravishing delights.  The doctrine that it is more blessed to give than to receive is literally true for those who are of a sympathetic disposition.  Parents enjoy the pleasures of their children as they never did their own egotistic delights.  In various ways sympathy has continued to grow, and at the present day the most refined and tender men and women include animals within the range of their pity and affection.  We organize societies for their protection, and we protest against the slaughter of birds that live on islands, thousands of miles away.  Our imagination has become so sensitive and vivid that it gives us a keen pang to think of the happy lives of these birds as being ruthlessly cut short and their young left to die in their nests in the agonies of cruel starvation.  If we compare with this state of mind that of the African of whom Burton wrote in his Two Trips to Gorilla Land, that “Cruelty seems to be with him a necessity of life, and all his highest enjoyments are connected with causing pain and inflicting death”—­we need no other argument to convince us that a savage cannot possibly feel romantic love, because that implies a capacity for the tenderest and subtlest sympathy.  I would sooner believe a tiger capable of such love than a savage, for the tiger practises cruelty unconsciously and accidentally while in quest of food, whereas the primitive man indulges in cruelty for cruelty’s sake, and for the delight it gives him.  We have here one more illustration of the change and growth of sentiments.  Man’s emotions develop as well as his reasoning powers, and one might as well expect an Australian, who cannot count five, to solve a problem in trigonometry as to love a woman as we love her.

AMOROUS SYMPATHY

In romantic love altruism reaches its climax.  Turgenieff did not exaggerate when he said that “it is in a man really in love as if his personality were eliminated.”  Genuine love makes a man shed egoism as a snake sheds its skin.  His one thought is:  “How can I make her happy and save her from grief” at whatever cost to his own comfort.  Amorous sympathy implies a complete self-surrender, an exchange of personalities: