forced illustrations and metaphors, but his powers of argument and debate were remarkably strong.  For about ten years he waged a continual struggle against the Government, urging especially a limitation to the duration of Parliament and losing no opportunity of asserting its claims to independence, or of attacking the pension list, which under the system then prevailing grew steadily from year to year.  Upon reform he also early fixed his attention, although, unlike Grattan, he was from the beginning to the end of his life steadily hostile to all proposals for giving the franchise to the Catholics.

[Illustration:  RIGHT HON.  HENRY FLOOD. (After a drawing by Comerford.)]

During the viceroyalty of Lord Townshend, who became Lord-Lieutenant in 1767, an Octennial Bill was passed limiting the duration of Parliament to eight years, but this momentary gleam of better things was not sustained; on the contrary, corruption was, under his rule, carried even further than it had been before.  Under the plea of breaking the power of the borough-owners, he set himself deliberately to make the whole Parliament subservient to Government, thus practically depriving it of what little vestige of independence it still possessed.  A succession of struggles took place, chiefly over Money Bills, the more independent members, under Flood’s leadership, claiming for the Irish House of Commons the complete control of the national purse, a claim as uniformly resisted by the Government.  Though almost invariably defeated on a division in the end the opposition were to a great degree successful, and in 1773 the hated viceroy was recalled.

This was the moment at which Flood stood higher in his countrymen’s estimation than was ever again the case.  He was identified with all that was best in their aspirations, and no shadow of self-seeking had as yet dimmed the brightness of his fame.  It was very different with his next step.  Lord Townshend was succeeded by Lord Harcourt, whose administration at first promised to be a shade more liberal and less corrupt than that of his predecessors.  Of this administration Flood, to his own misfortune, became a member.  What his motives were it is rather difficult to say.  He was a rich man, and therefore had no temptation to sell or stifle his opinions for place.  Whatever they were, it is clear, from letters still extant, that he not only accepted but solicited office.  He was made Vice-Treasurer, a post hitherto reserved for Englishmen, at a salary of L3,500 a year.

Although, as Mr. Lecky has pointed out, no actual stain of dishonour attaches to Flood in consequence of this step, there can be no doubt that it was a grave error, and that he lived to repent it bitterly.  For the next seven years not only was he forced to keep silence as regards all those points he had previously advocated so warmly, but, as a member of the Government, he actually helped to uphold some of the most damaging