Of course when one of these grand mountain ranges goes stretching across the printed page, it adorns and ennobles that literary landscape—­but at the same time it is a great distress to the new student, for it blocks up his way; he cannot crawl under it, or climb over it, or tunnel through it.  So he resorts to the dictionary for help, but there is no help there.  The dictionary must draw the line somewhere—­so it leaves this sort of words out.  And it is right, because these long things are hardly legitimate words, but are rather combinations of words, and the inventor of them ought to have been killed.  They are compound words with the hyphens left out.  The various words used in building them are in the dictionary, but in a very scattered condition; so you can hunt the materials out, one by one, and get at the meaning at last, but it is a tedious and harassing business.  I have tried this process upon some of the above examples.  “Freundshaftsbezeigungen” seems to be “Friendship demonstrations,” which is only a foolish and clumsy way of saying “demonstrations of friendship.”  “Unabhaengigkeitserklaerungen” seems to be “Independencedeclarations,” which is no improvement upon “Declarations of Independence,” so far as I can see.  “Generalstaatsverordnetenversammlungen” seems to be “General-statesrepresentativesmeetings,” as nearly as I can get at it—­a mere rhythmical, gushy euphemism for “meetings of the legislature,” I judge.  We used to have a good deal of this sort of crime in our literature, but it has gone out now.  We used to speak of a things as a “never-to-be-forgotten” circumstance, instead of cramping it into the simple and sufficient word “memorable” and then going calmly about our business as if nothing had happened.  In those days we were not content to embalm the thing and bury it decently, we wanted to build a monument over it.

But in our newspapers the compounding-disease lingers a little to the present day, but with the hyphens left out, in the German fashion.  This is the shape it takes:  instead of saying “Mr. Simmons, clerk of the county and district courts, was in town yesterday,” the new form put it thus:  “Clerk of the County and District Courts Simmons was in town yesterday.”  This saves neither time nor ink, and has an awkward sound besides.  One often sees a remark like this in our papers:  “Mrs. Assistant District Attorney Johnson returned to her city residence yesterday for the season.”  That is a case of really unjustifiable compounding; because it not only saves no time or trouble, but confers a title on Mrs. Johnson which she has no right to.  But these little instances are trifles indeed, contrasted with the ponderous and dismal German system of piling jumbled compounds together.  I wish to submit the following local item, from a Mannheim journal, by way of illustration: 

“In the daybeforeyesterdayshortlyaftereleveno’clock Night, the inthistownstandingtavern called ‘The Wagoner’ was downburnt.  When the fire to the onthedownburninghouseresting Stork’s Nest reached, flew the parent Storks away.  But when the bytheraging, firesurrounded Nest itself caught Fire, straightway plunged the quickreturning Mother-Stork into the Flames and died, her Wings over her young ones outspread.”