Of these points and others that might be mentioned there were two on which ecclesiastical authority felt that it must insist.  These were:  1.  The recent date of Creation; for, the remoter that event, the more urgent the necessity of vindicating the justice of God, who apparently had left the majority of our race to its fate, and had reserved salvation for the few who were living in the closing ages of the world; 2.  The perfect condition of Adam at his creation, since this was necessary to the theory of the fall, and the plan of salvation.

Theological authorities were therefore constrained to look with disfavor on any attempt to carry back the origin of the earth, to an epoch indefinitely remote, and on the Mohammedan theory of the evolution of man from lower forms, or his gradual development to his present condition in the long lapse of time.

From the puerilities, absurdities, and contradictions of the foregoing statement, we may gather how very unsatisfactory this so-called sacred science was.  And perhaps we may be brought to the conclusion to which Dr. Shuckford, above quoted, was constrained to come, after his wearisome and unavailing attempt to coordinate its various parts:  “As to the Fathers of the first ages of the Church, they were good men, but not men of universal learning.”

Sacred cosmogony regards the formation and modeling of the earth as the direct act of God; it rejects the intervention of secondary causes in those events.

Scientific cosmogony dates from the telescopic discovery made by Cassini—­an Italian astronomer, under whose care Louis XIV. placed the Observatory of Paris—­that the planet Jupiter is not a sphere, but an oblate spheroid, flattened at the poles.  Mechanical philosophy demonstrated that such a figure is the necessary result of the rotation of a yielding mass, and that the more rapid the rotation the greater the flattening, or, what comes to the same thing, the greater the equatorial bulging must be.

From considerations—­purely of a mechanical kind—­ Newton had foreseen that such likewise, though to a less striking extent, must be the figure of the earth.  To the protuberant mass is due the precession of the equinoxes, which requires twenty-five thousand eight hundred and sixty-eight years for its completion, and also the nutation of the earth’s axis, discovered by Bradley.  We have already had occasion to remark that the earth’s equatorial diameter exceeds the polar by about twenty-six miles.

Two facts are revealed by the oblateness of the earth:  1.  That she has formerly been in a yielding or plastic condition; 2.  That she has been modeled by a mechanical and therefore a secondary cause.

But this influence of mechanical causes is manifested not only in the exterior configuration of the globe of the earth as a spheroid of revolution, it also plainly appears on an examination of the arrangement of her substance.