it philosophy. In these higher activities the
line of likeness between man and the animal is of the
faintest description; while the line of contrast becomes
more and more pronounced and significant. When
we come to the summit of man the likeness vanishes
utterly. Among the lower life of the world there
is no
Magnificat, there is no
Nunc Dimittis;
the beginning and the end do not link themselves to
the Eternal. The brute has no religion, no temple,
no priest, no Bible, no sacrament of love between itself
and the invisible. The tower of this church tells
at once, and from afar, that it is a church.
Near at hand, much besides the tower tells the same
story. There is the cruciform foundation; there
is the structure of its walls. There is the outside
with distinct note; there is the inside with its joyous
beauty. Look at the church closely and you need
no tower to proclaim what it is. And yet the tower
is its most conspicuous witness: at a distance
it is the sole witness. Religion is similarly
the eminent token that man belongs to a divine order.
The basis of his being in sacrifice should repeat the
same tale. Civilization as a struggle after social
righteousness should announce the same fact.
Man’s thoughts and feelings, and their manifold
and marvelous expression in art, in institutions, and
in systems of opinion, utter the same testimony.
And yet the tower of his being, high soaring and far
seen, is his feeling for the invisible. You do
not know man until you behold him worshiping.
III. The third fact in our human situation is
that Christianity is the interpretation of religion.
You see the devout old Jew, Simeon, who met Jesus
as His mother brought Him for the first time into the
temple; and there you behold the old faith interpreted
by the new. All that was best in the Hebrew religion
is conserved and carried higher in the Christian religion.
Everywhere the devoutest Jews were conscious of wants
which the national faith did not meet. They waited
for the consolation of Israel, and when Christ came
he supplied satisfactions which Hebraism could not
supply. Christianity commended itself to the
disciples of Christ because it seemed to be their own
faith at its best. They were carried over into
it by the logic of their previous belief and their
deep human need. Paul sought righteousness as
a Jew; when he became a Christian, righteousness was
still his great quest. And Christianity commended
itself to him because the national ideal of righteousness
was set before him in a sublimer form, and because
a new inspiration came to him in his pursuit of it.
The old immemorial goal of human endeavor was exalted,
and the everlasting incentives were filled with the
freshness of a divine life. Thus the religious
Jew, when Christ came, was like a convalescent patient.
The process of recovery was going on, but in a way
that was discouragingly slow. The longing was
for the higher altitudes of the spirit, for the pure