the work should be developed. His fancy, which
enabled him to see the stage and all its characters,—almost
to
be them,—was so under the control
of his imagination, that it did not, through any interruptions
while he was at his labor, beguile him with caprices.
The
gradation or action of his work, opens
and grows under his creative hand; twenty or more characters
appear, (in some plays nearly forty, as in “Antony
and Cleopatra” and the “First Part of
Henry the Sixth,”) who are all distinguished,
who are all more or less necessary to the plot or
the underplots, and who preserve throughout an identity
that is life itself; all this is done, and the imagined
state, the great power by which this evolution of
characters and scene and story be carried on, is always
under the control of the poet’s will, and the
direction of his taste or critical judgment.
He chooses to set his imagination upon a piece of work,
he selects his plot, conceives the action, the variety
of characters, and all their doings; as he goes on
reflecting upon them, his imagination warms, and excites
his fancy; he sees and identifies himself with his
characters, lives a secondary life in his work, as
one may in a dream which he directs and yet believes
in; his whole soul becomes more active under this
fervor of the imagination, the fancy, and all the powers
of suggestion,—yet, still, the presiding
judgment remains calm above all, guiding the whole;
and above or behind that, the will which elects to
do all this, perchance for a very simple purpose,—namely,
for filthy lucre, the purchase-money of an estate
in Stratford.
To say that he “followed Nature” is to
mean that he permits his thoughts to flow out in the
order in which thoughts naturally come,—that
he makes his characters think as we all fancy we should
think under the circumstances in which he places them,—that
it is the truth of his thoughts which first impresses
us. It is in this respect that he is so universal;
and it is by his universality that his naturalness
is confirmed. Not all his finer strokes of genius,
but the general scope and progress of his mind, are
within the path all other minds travel; his mind answers
to all other men’s minds, and hence is like the
voice of Nature, which, apart from particular association,
addresses all alike. The cataracts, the mountains,
the sea, the landscapes, the changes of season and
weather have each the same general meaning to all
mankind. So it is with Shakspeare, both in the
conception and development of his characters, and
in the play of his reflections and fancies. All
the world recognizes his sanity, and the health and
beauty of his genius.