puzzled the few philologists who have examined it,
that they have declared none but a sphinx, and that
an Egyptian one, could unriddle it. I would suggest
that some Maga of the gypsies should be called in
to interpret. Our vagrant fortune-tellers are
reputed to be of Egyptian origin, and to hold converse
among themselves in a very strange and curious oriental
tongue called
Gibberish, which word, no doubt,
is a derivative from Gebir. Of the existence of
the mysterious epic, the public were made aware many
years ago by the first publication of Mr. Leigh Hunt’s
Feast of the Poets, where it was mentioned
in a note as a thing containing one good passage about
a shell, while in the text the author of
Gebir
was called a gander, and Mr. Southey rallied by Apollo
for his simplicity in proposing that the company should
drink the gabbler’s health. That pleasantry
has disappeared from Mr. Hunt’s poem, though
Mr. Landor has by no means left off gabbling.
Mr. Hunt is a kindly-natured man as well as a wit,
and no doubt perceived that he had been more prophetic
than he intended—Mr. Landor having, in
addition to verses uncounted unless on his own fingers,
favoured the world with five thick octavo volumes
of dialogues. From the four first I have culled
a few specimens; the fifth I have not read. It
is rumoured that a sixth is in the press, with a dedication
in the
issimo style, to Lord John Russell,
Mr. Landor’s lantern having at last enabled him
to detect one honest man in the Imperial Parliament.
Lord John, it seems, in the House of Commons lately
quoted something from him about a Chinese mandarin’s
opinion of the English; and Mr. Landor is so delighted
that he intends to take the Russells under his protection
for ever, and not only them, but every thing within
the range of their interests. Not a cast horse,
attached to a Woburn sand-cart, shall henceforth crawl
towards Bedford and Tavistock Squares, but the grateful
Walter shall swear he is a Bucephalus. You, Mr.
North, have placed the cart before the horse, in allowing
Mr. Landor’s dialogue between Porson and Southey
precedence of the following between Mr. Landor and
yourself.
You may object that it is a feigned colloquy, in which
an unauthorized use is made of your name. True;
but all Mr. Landor’s colloquies are likewise
feigned; and none is more fictitious than one that
has appeared in your pages, wherein Southey’s
name is used in a manner not only unauthorized, but
at which he would have sickened.
You and I must differ more widely in our notions of
fair play than I hope and believe we do, if you refuse
to one whose purpose is neither unjust nor ungenerous,
as much license in your columns as you have accorded
to Mr. Landor, when it was his whim, without the smallest
provocation, to throw obloquy on the venerated author
of the Excursion.
I am, Sir,
your faithful servant,
EDWARD
QUILLINAN.
* * * *
*