Scientific American Supplement, No. 460, October 25, 1884 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 135 pages of information about Scientific American Supplement, No. 460, October 25, 1884.

Scientific American Supplement, No. 460, October 25, 1884 eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 135 pages of information about Scientific American Supplement, No. 460, October 25, 1884.
fluid—­in short, do all by the perforated solids with circulations through them that we saw we could do by means of linked gyrostats.  But something that we cannot do by linked gyrostats we can do by the perforated bodies with fluid circulation:  we can make a model gas.  The mutual action at a distance, repulsive or attractive according to the mutual aspect of the two bodies when passing within collisional distance[1] of one another, suffices to produce the change of direction of motion in collision, which essentially constitutes the foundation of the kinetic theory of gases, and which, as we have seen before, may as well be due to attraction as to repulsion, so far as we know from any investigation hitherto made in this theory.

[Footnote 1:  According to this view, there is no precise distance, or definite condition respecting the distance, between two molecules, at which apparently they come to be in collision, or when receding from one another they cease to be in collision.  It is convenient, however, in the kinetic theory of gases, to adopt arbitrarily a precise definition of collision, according to which two bodies or particles mutually acting at a distance may be said to be in collision when their mutual action exceeds some definite arbitrarily assigned limit, as, for example, when the radius of curvature of the path of either body is less than a stated fraction (one one-hundredth, for instance) of the distance between them.]

There remains, however, as we have seen before, the difficulty of providing for the case of actual impacts between the solids, which must be done by giving them massless spring buffers or, which amounts to the same thing, attributing to them repulsive forces sufficiently powerful at very short distances to absolutely prevent impacts between solid and solid; unless we adopt the equally repugnant idea of infinitely small perforated solids, with infinitely great fluid circulations through them.  Were it not for this fundamental difficulty, the hydro-kinetic model gas would be exceedingly interesting; and, though we could scarcely adopt it as conceivably a true representation of what gases really are, it might still have some importance as a model configuration of solid and liquid matter, by which without elasticity the elasticity of true gas might be represented.

But lastly, since the hydro-kinetic model gas with perforated solids and fluid circulations through them fails because of the impacts between the solids, let us annul the solids and leave the liquid performing irrotational circulation round vacancy,[1] in the place of the solid cores which we have hitherto supposed; or let us annul the rigidity of the solid cores of the rings, and give them molecular rotation according to Helmholtz’s theory of vortex motion.  For stability the molecular rotation must be such as to give the same velocity at the boundary of the rotational fluid core as that of the irrotationally circulating liquid in contact with it, because, as

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Scientific American Supplement, No. 460, October 25, 1884 from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.