Ezekiel, Zechariah, and Joel. Each of these prophets
looked forward to the time when Jehovah would miraculously
overthrow their heathen foes, restore his scattered
people, and establish for them a world-wide, eternal
kingdom. In the closing chapters of the book
of Daniel this form of belief attains its fullest
expression in the Old Testament. In the Similitudes
of Enoch (37-71), which come either from the latter
part of the Maccabean era or else from the days of
Herod, these messianic hopes are still further developed.
Instead of Israel’s guardian angel Michael, represented
as coming on the clouds from heaven and in appearance
like a son of man, a heavenly Messiah is introduced.
He is known by the title of the Messiah, the Elect
One, and the Son of Man (probably taken from the book
of Daniel). In Enoch the term Son of Man has
evidently become, as in IV Esdras, the title of a
personal Messiah. He is described as pre-existent
and gifted with the divine authority. When he
appears, the dead are to rise, and angels, as well
as men, are to be tried before his tribunal. The
sinners and the fallen angels he will condemn to eternal
punishment. All sin and wrong shall be driven
from the earth. Heaven and earth shall be transformed,
and an eternal kingdom shall be established in which
all the righteous, whether dead or living, shall participate.
This was evidently the type of messianic hope held
by the Pharisees as well as the Essenes. As the
result of the teaching of the Pharisees it was held
widely by the Jews of the first Christian century.
It was clearly in the minds of Jesus’ disciples
when he made his last journey to Jerusalem. It
was both the background and the barrier to all his
work. It is the key to the interpretation of
Paul’s conception of the Christ, or the Messiah,
for he had been educated a Pharisee. This apocalyptic
type of messianic hope powerfully influenced the life
and thought of the early Christian Church and even
permeated the Gospel narratives. The question
of how far Jesus himself was influenced by it is one
of the most vital and difficult problems of early
Christian history.
IV. The Ethical and Universalistic Type of Messianic
Prophecy. Far removed from the kingly, messianic
hopes of the people and the supernatural visions of
the apocalypses were the plain, direct, practical
ideals of Israel’s great ethical prophets.
Amos, Hosea, Isaiah, and Jeremiah all united in declaring
that the realization of Jehovah’s purpose in
history depended primarily upon the response of his
people. They regarded the kingdom of God as a
natural growth. It represented the gradual transformation
of the characters of men under the influence of God’s
truth and spirit working in their minds. They
hoped and labored to see the nation Israel living
in full accord with the demands of justice, mercy,
and service. The ii Isaiah, under the influences
which grew out of the destruction of the temple and
the closer contact with the heathen world, voiced