please God and them, for the Pharisees are philosophers.  However, he desired, if they observed him offending in any respect or departing from the right way, that they would call him back and correct him.  When they testified that he was entirely virtuous he was well pleased with their approval.  But one of his guests, Eleazar by name, was a man malignant by nature, who delighted in dissension.  This man said:  “Since you wish to know the truth, if you really desire to do what is right, lay down the high priesthood and content yourself with the civil government of the people.”  And when Hyrcanus desired to know for what cause he ought to lay down the high priesthood, the other replied:  “We have heard from old men that your mother was a captive in the reign of Antiochus Epiphanes.”  This story was false, and Hyrcanus was provoked against him.  All the Pharisees likewise were very indignant with him.

[Sidenote:  Jos.  Ant.  XIII, 10:6a-c] Now there was a certain Jonathan, a great friend of Hyrcanus, but of the sect of the Sadducees, whose ideas are the opposite of those of the Pharisees.  He told Hyrcanus that Eleazar had cast that slur upon him according to the common opinion of all the Pharisees and that this would be made clear if he would ask them the question, What punishment they thought this man deserved?  For in this way he might be sure that the slur was not laid on him with their approval, if they advised punishing him as the crime deserved.  Therefore when Hyrcanus asked this question, the Pharisees answered that the man deserved stripes and imprisonment, but it did not seem right to punish a slur with death.  And indeed the Pharisees ordinarily are not apt to be severe in punishment.  At this mild sentence Hyrcanus was very angry and thought that this man reproved him with their approval.  It was this Jonathan who influenced him so far that he made him join the Sadducees and leave the party of the Pharisees and abolish the decrees that they had thus imposed on the people and punish those who obeyed them.  This was the source of the hatred with which he and his sons were regarded by the multitude.

[Sidenote:  Jos.  Ant.  XIII, 10:7] But when Hyrcanus had put an end to this sedition, he afterward lived happily and administered the government in the best manner for thirty-one years and then died, leaving behind him five sons.  He was esteemed by God worthy of the three highest honors, the rulership of his nation, the high priesthood, and prophecy, for God was with him and enabled him to predict the future.

[Sidenote:  Jos.  Ant.  XIII, 11:1a-c, 8a] Now when Hyrcanus was dead, his eldest son Aristobulus, intent upon changing the government into a monarchy, was the first to put a diadem on his head.  This Aristobulus loved his next brother Antigonus and treated him as an equal, but the others he kept in bonds.  He also cast his mother into prison because she disputed the government with him, for Hyrcanus had left her in control of everything.  He also proceeded to that degree of barbarity that he killed her in prison with hunger.  Moreover he was estranged from his brother Antigonus by false charges and also slew him, although he seemed to have a great affection for him and had shared the kingdom with him.  But Aristobulus immediately repented of the slaughter of his brother; on which account his disease grew upon him.