[70] Ulpian, Tit., vi, 3, 4, and 5.  Codex, v, 18, 4.

[71] Ulpian in Dig., xi, 7, 16; ibid., Papinian, 17; ibid, Julianus, 18.  Paulus, i, xxi, 11.

[72] Ulpian in Dig., 48, 20, 3.

[73] Ulpian in Dig., 48, 20, 5.

[74] Ulpian in Dig., 24, 1, 1:  Moribus apud nos receptum est, ne inter virum et uxorem donationes valerent, hoc autem receptum est, ne mutuo amore invicem spoliarentur, donationibus non temperantes, sed profusa erga se facilitate.

[75] Paulus in Dig., 24, 1, 14.

[76] Gaius in Dig., 24, 1, 42; ibid., Licinius Rufus, 41; Ulpian, Tit. vii, 1.  Martial, vii, 64—­et post hoc dominae munere factus eques.

[77] Paulus, ii, xxiii, 1.

[78] Cf.  Paulus, ii, xxiii, 2.

[79] Paulus in Dig., 25, 2, 1.  Codex, v, 21, 2.

[80] Gaius in Dig., 25, 2, 2.

[81] Paulus in Dig., 25, 2, 3.

[82] Ulpian in Dig., 47, 2, 52.  The respect shown for family relations may be seen also from the fact that a son could complain—­de facto matris queri—­if he believed that his mother had brought in supposititious offspring to defraud him of some of his inheritance; but he was strictly forbidden to bring her into court with a public and criminal action—­Macer in Dig., 48, 2, 11:  sed ream eam lege Cornelia facere permissum ei non est.

[83] Ulpian in Dig., 48, 14, 27.

[84] Ulpian in Dig., 48, 5, 14 (13):  Iudex adulterii ante oculos habere debet et inquirere, an maritus pudice vivens mulieri quoque bonos mores colendi auctor fuerit periniquum enim videtur esse, ut pudicitiam vir ab uxore exigat, quam ipse non exhibeat.  Cf.  Seneca, Ep., 94:  Scis improbum esse qui ab uxore pudicitiam exigit, ipse alienarum corruptor uxorum.  Scis ut illi nil cum adultero, sic nihil tibi esse debere cum pellice.  Antoninus Pius gave a husband a bill for adultery against his wife “Provided it is established that by your life you give her an example of fidelity.  It would be unjust that a husband should demand a fidelity which he does not himself keep”—­quoted by St. Augustine, de Conj.  Adult., ii, ch. 8.  In view of these explicit statements it is difficult to see what the Church Father Lactantius meant by asserting (de Vero Cultu, 23):  Non enim, sicut iuris publici ratio est, sola mulier adultera est, quae habet alium; maritus autem, etiamsi plures habeat, a crimine adulterii solutus est.  Perhaps this deliberate distortion of the truth was another one of the libels against pagan Rome of which the pious Fathers are so fond “for the good of the Church.”

[85] Papinian in Dig., 48, 5, 21 (20); ibid., Ulpian, 24 (23).  Paulus, ii, xxvi.

[86] Macer in Dig., 48, 5, 25 (24).

[87] Papinian in Dig., 48, 5, 23 (22).

[88] Papinian in Dig., 48, 5, 39 (38); ibid., Marcianus, 48, 8, 1.

[89] Paulus, ii, xxvi.  Macer in Dig., 48, 5, 25 (24), ibid., Ulpian, 48, 5, 30 (29).