of his genial philosophy. It is a chequered experience
that has made him what he is. He has known men
and cities; has probed in turn the mysteries of the
caucus, the green-room, and the Stock Exchange; has
been a diplomatist, a financier, a journalist, and
a politician. Under these circumstances, it is
perhaps not surprising that his faith—no
doubt originally robust—in the purity of
human nature and the uprightness of human motive should
have undergone some process of degeneration. Still
it may be questioned whether, after all that he has
seen and done, he is the absolute and all-round cynic
that he would seem to be. The palpable endeavour
to make out the worst of every one—including
himself—gives a certain flavour of unreality
to his conversation; but, in spite of this peculiarity,
he is an engaging talker. His language is racy
and incisive, and he talks as neatly as he writes.
His voice is pleasant, and his utterance deliberate
and effective. He has a keen eye for absurdities
and incongruities, a shrewd insight into affectation
and bombast, and an admirable impatience of all the
moral and intellectual qualities which constitute
the Bore. He is by no means inclined to bow his
knee too slavishly to an exalted reputation, and analyzes
with agreeable frankness the personal and political
qualities of great and good men, even if they sit
on the front Opposition bench. As a contributor
to enjoyment, as a promoter of fun, as an unmasker
of political and social humbug, he is unsurpassed.
His performances in debate are no concern of mine,
for I am speaking of conversation only; but most Members
of Parliament will agree that he is the best companion
that can be found for the last weary half-hour before
the division-bell rings, when some eminent nonentity
is declaiming his foregone conclusions to an audience
whose whole mind is fixed on the chance of finding
a disengaged cab in Palace Yard.
Like Mr. Labouchere, Lord Acton has touched life at
many points—but not the same. He is
a theologian, a professor, a man of letters, a member
of society; and his conversation derives a distinct
tinge from each of these environments. When,
at intervals all too long, he quits his retirement
at Cannes or Cambridge, and flits mysteriously across
the social scene, his appearance is hailed with devout
rejoicing by every one who appreciates manifold learning,
a courtly manner, and a delicately sarcastic vein
of humour. The distinguishing feature of Lord
Acton’s conversation is an air of sphinx-like
mystery, which suggests that he knows a great deal
more than he is willing to impart. Partly by
what he says, and even more by what he leaves unsaid,
his hearers are made to feel that, if he has not acted
conspicuous parts, he has been behind the scenes of
many and very different theatres.