Another capital talker is Sir George Trevelyan.  He has been, from the necessities of his position, a man of the world and a politician, and he is as ready as Mr. Bertie-Tremaine’s guests in Endymion to talk of “that heinous subject on which enormous fibs are ever told—­the Registration.”  But, after all, the man of the world and the politician are only respectable parts which he had been bound to assume, and he has played them—­with assiduity and success:  but the true man in Sir George Trevelyan is the man of letters.  Whenever he touches a historical or literary theme his whole being seems to undergo a transformation.  The real nature flashes out through his twinkling eyes.  While he muses the fire burns, and, like the Psalmist, he speaks with his tongue.  Dates and details, facts and traditions, cantos and poetry, reams of prose, English and Latin and Greek and French, come tumbling out in headlong but not disorderly array.  He jumps at an opening, seizes an illusion, replies with lightning quickness to a conversational challenge, and is ready at a moment’s notice to decide any literary or historical controversy in a measured tone of deliberate emphasis which is not wholly free from exaggeration.  Like his uncle Lord Macaulay, Sir George Trevelyan has “his own heightened and telling way of putting things,” and those who know him well make allowance for this habit.  For the rest, he is delightful company, light-hearted as a boy, full of autobiographical chit-chat about Harrow and Trinity, and India and Holly Lodge, eagerly interested in his friends’ concerns, brimming over with enthusiasm, never bored, never flat, never stale.  A well-concerted party is a kind of unconscious conspiracy to promote cheerfulness and enjoyment, and in such an undertaking there can be no more serviceable ally than Sir George Trevelyan.

Mr. John Morley’s agreeableness in conversation is of a different kind.  His leading characteristic is a dignified austerity of demeanour which repels familiarity and tends to keep conversation on a high level; but each time one meets him there is less formality and less restraint, and the grave courtesy which never fails is soon touched with friendliness and frank good-humour in a singularly attractive fashion.  He talks, not much, but remarkably well.  His sentences are deliberate, clear-cut, often eloquent.  He excels in phrase-making.  His quotations are apt and novel.  His fine taste and varied reading enable him to hold his own in many fields where the merely professional politician is apt to be terribly astray.  His kindness to social and literary beginners is one of his most engaging traits.  He invariably finds something pleasant to say about the most immature and unpromising efforts, and he has the knack of so handling his own early experience as to make it an encouragement and a stimulus, and not (as the manner of some is) a burden and a bogey.  Mr. Morley never obtrudes his own opinions, never introduces debatable matter, never dogmatizes.  But he is always ready to pick up the gauntlet, especially if a Tory flings it down; is merciless towards ill-formed assertion, and is the alert and unsparing enemy of what Mr. Ruskin calls “the obscene empires of Mammon and Belial.”