Nothing is so refreshing to a jaded sense of humour as to be the recipient of one of your own stories retold with appreciative fervour but with all the point left out.  This was my experience not long ago with reference to the story of Dr. Vaughan and his boy-bores which I have just related.  A Dissenting minister was telling me, with extreme satisfaction, that he had a son at Trinity College, Cambridge.  He went on to praise the Master, Dr. Butler, whom he extolled to the skies, winding up his eulogy with, “He has such wonderful tact in dealing with shy undergraduates.”  I began to scent my old story from afar, but held my peace and awaited results.  “You know,” he continued, “that young men are sometimes a little awkward about making a move and going away when a party is over.  Well, when Dr. Butler has undergraduates to breakfast, if they linger inconveniently long when he wants to be busy, he has such a happy knack of getting rid of them.  It is so tactful, so like him.  He goes up to one of them and says, ‘Can’t you go?  Must you stay?’ and they are off immediately.”  So, as Macaulay says of Montgomery’s literary thefts, may such ill-got gains ever prosper.

My Dissenting minister had a congener in the late Lord P——­, who was a rollicking man about town thirty years ago, and was famous, among other accomplishments, for this peculiar art of so telling a story as to destroy the point.  When the large house at Albert Gate, which fronts the French Embassy and is now the abode of Mr. Arthur Sassoon, was built, its size and cost were regarded as prohibitive, and some social wag christened it “Gibraltar, because it can never be taken.”  Lord P——­ thought that this must be an excellent joke, because every one laughed at it; and so he ran round the town saying to each man he met—­“I say, do you know what they call that big house at Albert Gate?  They call it Gibraltar, because it can never be let.  Isn’t that awfully good?” We all remember an innocent riddle of our childhood—­“Why was the elephant the last animal to get into the Ark?”—­to which the answer was, “Because he had to pack his trunk.”  Lord P—­asked the riddle, and gave as the answer, “Because he had to pack his portmanteau,” and was beyond measure astonished when his hearers did not join in his uproarious laughter.  Poor Lord P—! he was a fellow of infinite jest, though not always exactly in the sense that he intended.  If he had only known of it, he might with advantage have resorted to the conversational device of old Samuel Rogers, who, when he told a story which failed to produce a laugh, used to observe in a reflective tone, “The curious part of that story is that stupid people never see the point of it,” and then loud, though belated, guffaws resounded round the table.

XXV.

ADVERTISEMENTS.

Lately, when hunting for some notes which I had mislaid, I came upon a collection of Advertisements.  No branch of literature is more suggestive of philosophical reflections.  I take my specimens quite at random, just as they turn up in my diary, and the first which meets my eye is printed on the sad sea-green of the Westminster Gazette:—­