speak. She is as typical of the nineteenth century
as Fragonard’s ladies are of the Court of Louis
XV. To the right you see a picture of two shop-girls
with bonnets in their hands. So accurately are
the habitual movements of the heads and the hands observed
that you at once realise the years of bonnet-showing
and servile words that these women have lived through.
We have seen Degas do this before—it is
a welcome repetition of a familiar note, but it is
not until we turn to the set of nude figures that
we find the great artist revealing any new phase of
his talent. The first, in an attitude which suggests
the kneeling Venus, washes her thighs in a tin bath.
The second, a back view, full of the malformations
of forty years, of children, of hard work, stands gripping
her flanks with both hands. The naked woman has
become impossible in modern art; it required Degas’
genius to infuse new life into the worn-out theme.
Cynicism was the great means of eloquence of the middle
ages, and with cynicism Degas has rendered the nude
again an artistic possibility. What Mr. Horsley
or the British matron would say it is difficult to
guess. Perhaps the hideousness depicted by M.
Degas would frighten them more than the sensuality
which they condemn in Sir Frederick Leighton.
But, be this as it may, it is certain that the great,
fat, short-legged creature, who in her humble and
touching ugliness passes a chemise over her lumpy shoulders,
is a triumph of art. Ugliness is trivial, the
monstrous is terrible; Velasquez knew this when he
painted his dwarfs.
Pissarro exhibited a group of girls gathering apples
in a garden—sad greys and violets beautifully
harmonised. The figures seem to move as in a dream:
we are on the thither side of life, in a world of quiet
colour and happy aspiration. Those apples will
never fall from the branches, those baskets that the
stooping girls are filling will never be filled:
that garden is the garden of the peace that life has
not for giving, but which the painter has set in an
eternal dream of violet and grey.
Madame Morizot exhibited a series of delicate fancies.
Here are two young girls; the sweet atmosphere folds
them as with a veil; they are all summer; their dreams
are limitless, their days are fading, and their ideas
follow the flight of the white butterflies through
the standard roses. Take note, too, of the stand
of fans; what delicious fancies are there—willows,
balconies, gardens, and terraces.
Then, contrasting with these distant tendernesses,
there was the vigorous painting of Guillaumin.
There life is rendered in violent and colourful brutality.
The ladies fishing in the park, with the violet of
the skies and the green of the trees descending upon
them, is a chef d’oeuvre. Nature
seems to be closing about them like a tomb; and that
hillside,—sunset flooding the skies with
yellow and the earth with blue shadow,—is
another piece of painting that will one day find a
place in one of the public galleries; and the same
can be said of the portrait of the woman on a background
of chintz flowers.