fine poetry; the beauty of colour and outline, the
combination of notes, the melody of versification,
may be imitated by artists of mediocrity; and many
will view, hear, or peruse their performances, without
being able positively to discover why they should
not, since composed according to all the rules, afford
pleasure equal to those of Raphael, Handel, or Dryden.
The deficiency lies in the vivifying spirit, which,
like alcohol, may be reduced to the same principle
in all, though it assumes such varied qualities from
the mode in which it is exerted or combined.
Of this power of intellect, Dryden seems to have possessed
almost an exuberant share, combined, as usual, with
the faculty of correcting his own conceptions, by
observing human nature, the practical and experimental
philosophy as well of poetry as of ethics or physics.
The early habits of Dryden’s education and poetical
studies gave his researches somewhat too much of a
metaphysical character; and it was a consequence of
his mental acuteness, that his dramatic personages
often philosophised or reasoned, when they ought only
to have felt. The more lofty, the fiercer, the
more ambitious feelings, seem also to have been his
favourite studies. Perhaps the analytical mode
in which he exercised his studies of human life tended
to confine his observation to the more energetic feelings
of pride, anger, ambition, and other high-toned passions.
He that mixes in public life must see enough of these
stormy convulsions; but the finer and more imperceptible
operations of love, in its sentimental modifications,
if the heart of the author does not supply an example
from its own feelings, cannot easily be studied at
the expense of others. Dryden’s bosom,
it must be owned, seems to have afforded him no such
means of information; the licence of his age, and
perhaps the advanced period at which he commenced his
literary career, had probably armed him against this
more exalted strain of passion. The love of the
senses he has in many places expressed, in as forcible
and dignified colouring as the subject could admit;
but of a mere moral and sentimental passion he seems
to have had little idea, since he frequently substitutes
in its place the absurd, unnatural, and fictitious
refinements of romance. In short, his love is
always in indecorous nakedness, or sheathed in the
stiff panoply of chivalry. But if Dryden fails
in expressing the milder and more tender passions,
not only did the stronger feelings of the heart, in
all its dark or violent workings, but the face of
natural objects, and their operation upon the human
mind, pass promptly in review at his command.
External pictures, and their corresponding influence
on the spectator, are equally ready at his summons;
and though his poetry, from the nature of his subjects,
is in general rather ethic and didactic, than narrative
of composition, than his figures and his landscapes
are presented to the mind with the same vivacity as
the flow of his reasoning, or the acute metaphysical
discrimination of his characters.