dignity, both for sound and number, than any other
verse in use among us. By this attention to sound
and rhythm, he improved upon the school of metaphysical
poets, which disclaimed attention to either; but in
the thought and expression itself, the style of Davenant
more nearly resembled Cowley’s, than that of
Denham and Waller. The same ardour for what Dryden
calls “wit-writing,” the same unceasing
exercise of the memory, in search of wonderful thoughts
and allusions, and the same contempt for the subject,
except as the medium of displaying the author’s
learning and ingenuity, marks the style of Davenant,
though in a less degree than that of the metaphysical
poets, and though chequered with many examples of
a simpler and chaster character. Some part of
this deviation was, perhaps, owing to the nature of
the stanza; for the structure of the quatrain prohibited
the bard, who used it, from rambling into those digressive
similes, which, in the pindaric strophe, might be
pursued through endless ramifications. If the
former started an extravagant thought, or a quaint
image, he was compelled to bring it to a point within
his four-lined stanza. The snake was thus scotched,
though not killed; and conciseness being rendered indispensable,
a great step was gained towards concentration of thought,
which is necessary to the simple and to the sublime
The manner of Davenant, therefore, though short-lived,
and ungraced by public applause, was an advance towards
true taste, from the unnatural and frantic indulgence
of unrestrained fancy; and, did it claim no other
merit, it possesses that of having been twice sanctioned
by the practice of Dryden, upon occasions of uncommon
solemnity.
The “Annus Mirabilis” evinces a
considerable portion of labour and attention; the
lines and versification are highly polished, and the
expression was probably carefully corrected. Dryden
as Johnson remarks, already exercised the superiority
of his genius, by recommending his own performance,
as written upon the plan of Virgil; and as no unsuccessful
effort at producing those well-wrought images and descriptions,
which create admiration, the proper object of heroic
poetry. The “Annus Mirabilis”
may indeed be regarded as one of Dryden’s most
elaborate pieces; although it is not written in his
later, better, and most peculiar style of poetry.
The poem first appeared in octavo, in 1667, and was
afterwards frequently reprinted in quarto. It
was dedicated to the metropolis of Great Britain,
as represented by the lord mayor and magistrates.
A letter to Sir Robert Howard was prefixed to the
poem, in which the author explains the purpose of
the work, and the difficulties which presented themselves
in the execution. And in this epistle, as a contrast
between the smooth and easy style of writing which
was proper in addressing a lady, and the exalted style
of heroic, or at least historical, poetry, he introduces
the verses to the Duchess of York, already mentioned.