but the men who were guilty of it, were then living under Dryden’s observation and their manners and habits could not fail to teach him, to anticipate the little encouragement they were likely to afford to the loftier labours of poetry.  One only line remained, in which poetical talents might exert themselves, with some chance of procuring their possessor’s reward, or at least maintenance, and this was dramatic composition.  To this Dryden sedulously applied himself, with various success, for many years.  But before proceeding to trace the history of his dramatic career, I proceed to notice such pieces of his poetry, as exhibit marks of his earlier style of composition.

The victory gained by the Duke of York over the Dutch fleet on the 3d of June 1665, and his Duchess’s subsequent journey into the north, furnished Dryden with the subject of a few occasional verses; in which the style of Waller (who came forth with a poem on the same subject) is successfully imitated.  In addressing her grace, the poet suppresses all the horrors of the battle, and turns her eyes upon the splendour of a victory, for which the kingdom was indebted to her husband’s valour, and her “chaste vows.”  In these verses, not the least vestige of metaphysical wit can be traced; and they were accordingly censured, as wanting height of fancy, and dignity of words.  This criticism Dryden refuted, by alleging, that he had succeeded in what he did attempt, in the softness of expression and smoothness of the measure (the appropriate ornaments of an address to a lady), and that he was accused of that only thing which he could well defend.  It seems, however, very possible, that these remarks impelled him to undertake a task, in which vigour of fancy and expression might, with propriety, be exercised.  Accordingly, his next poem was of greater length and importance.  This is a historical account of the events of the year 1666, under the title of “Annus Mirabilis” to which distinction the incidents which had occurred in that space gave it some title.  The poem being in the elegiac stanza, Dryden relapsed into an imitation of “Gondibert,” from which he had departed ever since the “Elegy on Cromwell.”  From this it appears, that the author’s admiration of Davenant had not decreased.  Indeed, he, long afterwards, bore testimony to that author’s quick and piercing imagination; which at once produced thoughts remote, new, and surprising, such as could not easily enter into any other fancy.  Dryden at least equalled Davenant in this quality; and certainly excelled him in the powers of composition, which are to embody the conceptions of the imagination; and in the extent of acquired knowledge, by which they were to be enforced and illustrated.  In his preface, he has vindicated the choice of his stanza, by a reference to the opinion of Davenant,[47] which he sanctions by affirming, that he had always himself thought quatrains, or stanzas of verse in alternate rhyme, more noble, and of greater