Southerne and Congreve were principally distinguished
by Dryden’s friendship. His intimacy with
the former, though oddly commenced, seems soon to have
ripened into such sincere friendship, that the aged
poet selected Southerne to finish “Cleomenes,”
and addressed to him an epistle of condolence on the
failure of “The Wives’ Excuse,” which,
as he delicately expresses it, “was with a kind
civility dismissed” from the scene. This
was indeed an occasion in which even Dryden could tell,
from experience, how much the sympathy of friends
was necessary to soothe the injured feelings of an
author. But Congreve seems to have gained yet
further than Southerne upon Dryden’s friendship.
He was introduced to him by his first play, the celebrated
“Old Bachelor,” being put into the poet’s
hands to be revised. Dryden, after making a few
alterations to fit it for the stage, returned it to
the author with the high and just commendation that
it was the best first play he had ever seen. In
truth, it was impossible that Dryden could be insensible
to the brilliancy of Congreve’s comic dialogue,
which has never been equalled by any English dramatist,
unless by Mr. Sheridan. Less can be said for the
tragedies of Southerne, and for “The Mourning
Bride.” Although these pieces contain many
passages of great interest, and of beautiful poetry,
I know not but they contributed more than even the
subsequent homilies of Rowe, to chase natural and
powerful expression of passion from the English stage,
and to sink it into that maudlin, and affected, and
pedantic style of tragedy, which haunted the stage
till Shakespeare awakened at the call of Garrick.
“The Fatal Marriage” of Southerne is an
exception to this false taste; for no one who has
seen Mrs. Siddons in Isabella, can deny Southerne
the power of moving the passions, till amusement becomes
bitter and almost insupportable distress. But
these observations are here out of place. Addison
paid an early tribute to Dryden’s fame, by the
verses addressed to him on his translations. Among
Dryden’s less distinguished intimates, we observe
Sir Henry Shere, Dennis the critic, Moyle, Motteux,
Walsh, who lived to distinguish the youthful merit
of Pope, and other men of the second rank in literature.
These, as his works testify, he frequently assisted
with prefaces, occasional verses, or similar contributions.
But among our author’s followers and admirers,
we must not reckon Swift, although related to him,[3]
and now coming into notice. It is said, that
Swift had subjected to his cousin’s perusal,
some of those performances, entitled Odes, which
appear in the seventh volume of the last edition of
his works. Even the eye of Dryden was unable
to discover the wit and the satirist in the clouds
of incomprehensible pindaric obscurity in which he
was enveloped; and the aged bard pronounced the hasty,
and never to be pardoned sentence,— “Cousin
Swift, you will never be a poet."[4] A doom which he,
on whom it was passed, attempted to repay, by repeated,
although impotent, attacks upon the fame of Dryden,
everywhere scattered through his works. With
the exception of Swift, no author of eminence, whose
labours are still in request, has ventured to assail
the poetical fame of Dryden.