original, the most inexhaustible, the most wonderful,
of modern humorists. Creations such as Mrs. Nickleby,
Mr. Micawber, Sam Weller, Sairy Gamp, take rank with
Falstaff and Dogberry; while many others, like Dick
Swiveller, Stiggins, Chadband, Mrs. Jellyby, and Julia
Mills, are almost equally good. In the innumerable
swarm of minor characters with which he has enriched
our comic literature there is no indistinctness.
Indeed, the objection that has been made to him is
that his characters are too distinct—that
he puts labels on them; that they are often mere personifications
of a single trick of speech or manner, which becomes
tedious and unnatural by repetition. Thus, Grandfather
Smallweed is always settling down into his cushion,
and having to be shaken up; Mr. Jellyby is always sitting
with his head against the wall; Peggotty is always
bursting her buttons off,
etc. As Dickens’s
humorous characters tend perpetually to run into caricatures
and grotesques, so his sentiment, from the same excess,
slops over too frequently into “gush,”
and into a too deliberate and protracted attack upon
the pity. A favorite humorous device in his style
is a stately and roundabout way of telling a trivial
incident, as where, for example, Mr. Roker “muttered
certain unpleasant invocations concerning his own
eyes, limbs, and circulating fluids;” or where
the drunken man who is singing comic songs in the
Fleet received from Mr. Smangle “a gentle intimation,
through the medium of the water-jug, that his audience
were not musically disposed.” This manner
was original with Dickens, though he may have taken
a hint of it from the mock heroic language of
Jonathan
Wild; but as practiced by a thousand imitators,
ever since, it has gradually become a burden.
It would not be the whole truth to say that the difference
between the humor of Thackeray and Dickens is the
same as between that of Shakspere and Ben Jonson.
Yet it is true that the “humors” of Ben
Jonson have an analogy with the extremer instances
of Dickens’s character sketches in this respect,
namely, that they are both studies of the eccentric,
the abnormal, the whimsical, rather than of the typical
and universal; studies of manners, rather than of
whole characters. And it is easily conceivable
that, at no distant day, the oddities of Captain Cuttle,
Deportment Turveydrop, Mark Tapley, and Newman Noggs
will seem as far-fetched and impossible as those of
Captain Otter, Fastidious Brisk and Sir Amorous La-Foole.
When Dickens was looking about for some one to take
Seymour’s place as illustrator of Pickwick,
Thackeray applied for the job, but without success.
He was then a young man of twenty-five, and still hesitating
between art and literature. He had begun to draw
caricatures with his pencil when a school-boy at the
Charter House, and to scribble them with his pen when
a student at Cambridge, editing The Snob, a
weekly under-graduate paper, and parodying the prize