32.  Now these statements are either true or false; and I know not on which supposition they are most creditable to the writer.  Had any Roman grammatist thus profited by the name of Varro or Quintilian, he would have been filled with constant dread of somewhere meeting the injured author’s frowning shade!  Surely, among the professed admirers of Murray, no other man, whether innovator or copyist, unfortunate or successful, is at all to be compared to this gentleman for the audacity with which he has “not scrupled to alter, mutilate, and torture, the text of that able writer.”  Murray simply intended to do good, and good that might descend to posterity; and this just and generous intention goes far to excuse even his errors.  But Kirkham, speaking of posterity, scruples not to disavow and to renounce all care for them, or for any thing which a coming age may think of his character:  saying,

“My pretensions reach not so far.  To the present generation only, I present my claims.  Should it lend me a listening ear, and grant me its suffrages, the height of my ambition will be attained.”—­Advertisement, in his Elocution, p. 346.

His whole design is, therefore, upon the very face of it, a paltry scheme of present income.  And, seeing his entered classes of boys and girls must soon have done with him, he has doubtless acted wisely, and quite in accordance with his own interest, to have made all possible haste in his career.

33.  Being no rival with him in this race, and having no personal quarrel with him on any account, I would, for his sake, fain rejoice at his success, and withhold my criticisms; because he is said to have been liberal with his gains, and because he has not, like some others, copied me instead of Murray.  But the vindication of a greatly injured and perverted science, constrains me to say, on this occasion, that pretensions less consistent with themselves, or less sustained by taste and scholarship, have seldom, if ever, been promulgated in the name of grammar.  I have, certainly, no intention to say more than is due to the uninformed and misguided.  For some who are ungenerous and prejudiced themselves, will not be unwilling to think me so; and even this freedom, backed and guarded as it is by facts and proofs irrefragable, may still be ingeniously ascribed to an ill motive.  To two thirds of the community, one grammar is just as good as an other; because they neither know, nor wish to know, more than may be learned from the very worst.  An honest expression of sentiment against abuses of a literary nature, is little the fashion of these times; and the good people who purchase books upon the recommendations of others, may be slow to believe there is no merit where so much has been attributed.  But facts may well be credited, in opposition to courteous flattery, when there are the author’s own words and works to vouch for them in the face of day.  Though a thousand of our great men may have helped a copier’s weak copyist to take “some practical advantage” of the world’s credulity, it is safe to aver, in the face of dignity still greater, that testimonials more fallacious have seldom mocked the cause of learning.  They did not read his book.