25.  Take first from one page of his “hundred and fifth edition,” a few brief quotations, as a sample of his thoughts and style: 

“They, however, who introduce usages which depart from the analogy and philosophy of a language, are conspicuous among the number of those who form that language, and have power to control it.”  “PRINCIPLE.—­A principle in grammar is a peculiar construction of the language, sanctioned by good usage.”  “DEFINITION.—­A definition in grammar is a principle of language expressed in a definite form.”  “RULE.—­A rule describes the peculiar construction or circumstantial relation of words, which custom has established for our observance.”—­Kirkham’s Grammar, page 18.

Now, as “a rule describes a peculiar construction,” and “a principle is a peculiar construction,” and “a definition is a principle;” how, according to this grammarian, do a principle, a definition, and a rule, differ each from the others?  From the rote here imposed, it is certainly not easier for the learner to conceive of all these things distinctly, than it is to understand how a departure from philosophy may make a man deservedly “conspicuous.”  It were easy to multiply examples like these, showing the work to be deficient in clearness, the first requisite of style.

26.  The following passages may serve as a specimen of the gentleman’s taste, and grammatical accuracy; in one of which, he supposes the neuter verb is to express an action, and every honest man to be long since dead! So it stands in all his editions.  Did his praisers think so too?

“It is correct to say, The man eats, he eats; but we cannot say, The man dog eats, he dog eats.  Why not?  Because the man is here represented as the possessor, and dog, the property, or thing possessed; and the genius of our language requires, that when we add to the possessor, the thing which he is represented as possessing, the possessor shall take a particular form to show ITS case, or relation to the property.”—­Ib., p. 52.

THE PRESENT TENSE.—­“This tense is sometimes applied to represent the actions of persons long since dead; as, ’Seneca reasons and moralizes well; An HONEST MAN IS the noblest work of God.’”—­Ib., p. 138.

PARTICIPLES.—­“The term Participle comes from the Latin word participio,[10] which signifies to partake.”—­“Participles are formed by adding to the verb the termination ing, ed, or en. Ing signifies the same thing as the noun being.  When postfixed to the noun-state of the verb, the compound word thus formed expresses a continued state of the verbal denotement.  It implies that what is meant by the verb, is being continued.”—­Ib., p. 78.  “All participles are compound in their meaning and office.”—­Ib., p. 79.