OBS. 2.—­In most languages, there are in each tense, through all the moods of every verb, six different terminations to distinguish the different persons and numbers.  This will be well understood by every one who has ever glanced at the verbs as exhibited in any Latin, Greek, French, Spanish, or Italian grammar.  To explain it to others, a brief example shall be given:  (with the remark, that the Latin pronouns, here inserted, are seldom expressed, except for emphasis:) “Ego amo, I love; Tu amas, Thou lovest; Ille amat, He loves; Nos amamus, We love; Vos amatis, You love; Illi amant, They love.”  Hence it may be perceived, that the paucity of variations in the English verb, is a very striking peculiarity of our language.  Whether we are gainers or losers by this simplicity, is a question for learned idleness to discuss.  The common people who speak English, have far less inclination to add new endings to our verbs, than to drop or avoid all the remains of the old.  Lowth and Murray tell us, “This scanty provision of terminations is sufficient for all the purposes of discourse;” and that, “For this reason, the plural termination en, (they loven, they weren,) formerly in use, was laid aside as unnecessary, and has long been obsolete.”—­Lowth’s Gram., p. 31; Murray’s, 63.

OBS. 3.—­Though modern usage, especially in common conversation, evidently inclines to drop or shun all unnecessary suffixes and inflections, still it is true, that the English verb in some of its parts, varies its termination, to distinguish, or agree with, the different persons and numbers.  The change is, however, principally confined to the second and third persons singular of the present tense of the indicative mood, and to the auxiliaries hast and has of the perfect.  In the ancient biblical style, now used only on solemn occasions, the second person singular is distinguished through all the tenses of the indicative and potential moods.  And as the use of the pronoun thou is now mostly confined to the solemn style, the terminations of that style are retained in connexion with it, through all the following examples of the conjugation of verbs.  In the plural number, there is no variation of ending, to denote the different persons; and the verb in the three persons plural, (with the two exceptions are and were, from am and was,) is the same as in the first person singular.  Nor does the use of you for the singular, warrant its connexion with any other than the plural form of the verb.  This strange and needless confusion of the numbers, is, in all languages that indulge it, a practical inconvenience.  It would doubtless have been much better, had thou and you still kept their respective places—­the one, nominative singular—­the other, objective plural—­as they appear in the Bible.  But as the English verb is always attended by a noun or a pronoun, expressing the subject of the affirmation, no ambiguity arises from the want of particular terminations in the verb, to distinguish the different persons and numbers.