authors, and many more, agree, that, “A verb neuter expresses neither action nor passion, but being, or a state of being.”—­L.  Murray.  Yet, according to their scheme, such words as walk, run, fly, strive, struggle, wrestle, contend, are verbs neuter.  In view of this palpable absurdity, I cannot but think it was a useful improvement upon the once popular scheme of English grammar, to make active-intransitive verbs a distinct class, and to apply the term neuter to those few only which accord with the foregoing definition.  This had been done before the days of Lindley Murray, as may be seen in Buchanan’s English Syntax, p. 56, and in the old British Grammar, p. 153, each published many years before the appearance of his work;[224] and it has often been done since, and is preferred even by many of the professed admirers and followers of Murray; as may be seen in the grammars of Comly, Fisk, Merchant, Kirkham, and others.

OBS. 6.—­Murray himself quotes this improved distribution, and with some appearance of approbation; but strangely imagines it must needs be inconvenient in practice.  Had he been a schoolmaster, he could hardly have so judged.  He says, “Verbs have been distinguished by some writers, into the following kinds:—­

“1st. Active-transitive, or those which denote an action that passes from the agent to some object:  as, Caesar conquered Pompey.

“2d. Active-intransitive, or those which express that kind of action, which has no effect upon any thing beyond itself:  as, Caesar walked.

“3d. Passive, or those which express, not action, but passion, whether pleasing or painful:  as, Portia was loved; Pompey was conquered.

“4th. Neuter, or those which express an attribute that consists neither in action nor passion:  as, Caesar stood.

“This appears to be an orderly arrangement.  But if the class of active-intransitive verbs were admitted, it would rather perplex than assist the learner:  for the difference between verbs active and neuter, as transitive and intransitive is easy and obvious:  but the difference between verbs absolutely neuter and [those which are] intransitively active, is not always clear.  It is, indeed, often very difficult, if not impossible to be ascertained.”—­Murray’s Gram., 8vo, p. 60.[225]

OBS. 7.—­The following note, from a book written on purpose to apply the principles of Murray’s Grammar, and of Allen’s, (the two best of the foregoing two dozen,) may serve as an offset to the reason above assigned for rejecting the class of active-intransitive verbs:  “It is possible that some teachers may look upon the nice distinction here made, between the active transitive and the active intransitive verbs, as totally unnecessary.  They may, perhaps, rank the latter with the neuter verbs.  The author had his choice of difficulties:  on