Weight, measure, &c., see Time.
Wert, as used in lieu of wast
—its mood not easy
to determine; authorities for a various use of.
What, its class and nature
—to what usually
applied; its twofold relat. explained
—its numb.; example
of solec. in the use of
—as a mere adj.,
or as a pron. indef.
—its use both as
an adj. and as a relative at the same time; do. for
who or
which, ludic. and vulg.
—declined
—how to be disposed
of in etymolog. parsing; how to be parsed
syntactically
—how becomes an
interj.
—used appar. for
an adv.; uttered exclamatorily before an adj., to be
taken as an adj.,
("WHAT PARTIAL judges are our,” &c.,)
—followed by that,
by way of pleonasm, ("WHAT I tell you in
darkness,
THAT,” &c.,)
—with but
preceding, ("To find a friend, BUT WHAT”
&c.,)
—vulg. use of,
for that
—derivation of,
from Sax., shown.
Whatever or whatsoever, its peculiarities
of construe., the same as
those of what; its use in simp, relation
—its construc.
as a double relative; whether it may be supposed
ellipt.
—its declension.
When, where, or while, in what instance
not fit to follow the verb is
—When, where,
whither, as partaking of the nature of a pron.;
construc, of do.,
with antecedent nouns of time, &c., how far
allowable
—derivation of,
from Anglo-Sax.
Whether, as an interrog. pron.; as a disjunc.
conjunc.
—conjunc. corresponsive
to or
—as do., its derivation
from Sax.
Which, relative
—its former use;
to what objects now confined
—its use after
a personal term taken by meton. for a thing; do., as
still applicable
to persons
—is of all the
genders, (in oppos. to MURR., WEBST., et. al.,)
—is less approp.
than who, in all personifications
—its construc.
when taken in its discrim. sense,
—how differs from
the rel. that
—BLAIR’S
incorrect remarks respecting
—Which,
as rel. or interrog., declined
—Which,
sometimes takes whose for its poss.,
—represents a prop.
name taken merely as a name, ("Herod
—WHICH is but,”
&c.,)
—do. nouns of mult,
expressing persons, when such are strictly of the
neut. gend., ("The
COMMITTEES WHICH” &c.,)
—in what cases
is less approp. than that
—does not fitly
represent an indicative assertion, (’"Be ATTENTIVE,
without
WHICH,” &c.,)
—its Sax. derivation
shown
—The which,
obsol.,
—Which,
interrog., what demands,
—to what objects
applied
—now used for the
obsol. whether.