of two Kays as of two days, of two Exes as of two foxes,
of two Effs as of two skiffs; and there ought to be
no more difficulty about the correct way of writing
the word in the one case, than in the other. In
Dr. Sam. Prat’s Latin Grammar, (an elaborate
octavo, all Latin, published in London, 1722,) nine
of the consonants are reckoned mutes; b, c, d, g, p,
q, t, j, and v; and eight, semivowels; f, l, m, n,
r, s, x, z. “All the mutes,” says
this author, “are named by placing
e after
them; as, be, ce, de, ge, except
q, which ends
in
u.” See p. 8. “The
semivowels, beginning with
e, end in themselves;
as, ef,
ach, el, em, en, er, es,
ex,
(or, as Priscian will have it,
ix,)
eds.”
See p. 9. This mostly accords with the names
given in the preceding paragraph; and so far as it
does not, I judge the author to be wrong. The
reader will observe that the Doctor’s explanation
is neither very exact nor quite complete: K is
a mute which is not enumerated, and the rule would
make the name of it
Ke, and not
Ka;—H
is not one of his eight semivowels, nor does the name
Ach accord with his rule or seem like a Latin word;—the
name of Z, according to his principle, would be
Ez
and not “
Eds,” although the latter
may better indicate the
sound which was then
given to this letter.
OBS. 13.—If the history of these names
exhibits diversity, so does that of almost all other
terms; and yet there is some way of writing every word
with correctness, and correctness tends to permanence.
But Time, that establishes authority, destroys it
also, when he fairly sanctions newer customs.
To all names worthy to be known, it is natural to wish
a perpetual uniformity; but if any one thinks the
variableness of these to be peculiar, let him open
the English Bible of the fourteenth century, and read
a few verses, observing the names. For instance:
“Forsothe whanne Eroude was to bringynge
forth hym, in that nigt Petir was slepynge bitwixe
tweyno knytis.”—Dedis, (i.
e., Acts,) xii, 6. “Crist Ihesu
that is to demynge the quyke and deed.”—2
Tim., iv, 1. Since this was written for English,
our language has changed much, and at the same time
acquired, by means of the press, some aids to stability.
I have recorded above the true names of the
letters, as they are now used, with something of their
history; and if there could be in human works any thing
unchangeable, I should wish, (with due deference to
all schemers and fault-finders,) that these names
might remain the same forever.