But it rarely happens that any one work requires the use of all these divisions; and we often assume some natural distinction and order of parts, naming each as we find it; and also subdivide into articles, verses, cantoes, stanzas, and other portions, as the nature of the subject suggests.

Grammar is divided into four parts; namely, Orthography, Etymology, Syntax, and Prosody.

Orthography treats of letters, syllables, separate words, and spelling.

Etymology treats of the different parts of speech, with their classes and modifications.

Syntax treats of the relation, agreement, government, and arrangement of words in sentences.

Prosody treats of punctuation, utterance, figures, and versification.

OBSERVATIONS.

OBS. 1.—­In the Introduction to this work, have been taken many views of the study, or general science, of grammar; many notices of its history, with sundry criticisms upon its writers or critics; and thus language has often been presented to the reader’s consideration, either as a whole, or with broader scope than belongs to the teaching of its particular forms.  We come now to the work of analyzing our own tongue, and of laying down those special rules and principles which should guide us in the use of it, whether in speech or in writing.  The author intends to dissent from other grammarians no more than they are found to dissent from truth and reason; nor will he expose their errors further than is necessary for the credit of the science and the information of the learner.  A candid critic can have no satisfaction merely in finding fault with other men’s performances.  But the facts are not to be concealed, that many pretenders to grammar have shown themselves exceedingly superficial in their knowledge, as well as slovenly in their practice; and that many vain composers of books have proved themselves despisers of this study, by the abundance of their inaccuracies, and the obviousness of their solecisms.

OBS. 2.—­Some grammarians have taught that the word language is of much broader signification, than that which is given to it in the definition above.  I confine it to speech and writing.  For the propriety of this limitation, and against those authors who describe the thing otherwise, I appeal to the common sense of mankind.  One late writer defines it thus:  “LANGUAGE is any means by which one person communicates his ideas to another.”—­Sanders’s Spelling-Book, p. 7.  The following is the explanation of an other slack thinker:  “One may, by speaking or by writing, (and sometimes by motions,) communicate his thoughts to others. The process by which this is done, is called LANGUAGE.—­Language is the expression of thought and feeling.”—­S.  W. Clark’s Practical Gram., p. 7.  Dr. Webster goes much further, and says, “LANGUAGE,