cor. “Richard’s restoration to respectability depends on his paying of his debts.”—­O.  B. Peirce cor. “Their supplying of ellipses where none ever existed; their parsing of the words of sentences already full and perfect, as though depending on words understood.”—­Id. “Her veiling of herself, and shedding of tears, &c., her upbraiding of Paris for his cowardice,” &c.—­Blair cor. “A preposition may be made known by its admitting of a personal pronoun after it, in the objective case.”—­Murray et al. cor. “But this forms no just objection to its denoting of time.”—­L.  Mur. cor. “Of men’s violating or disregarding of the relations in which God has here placed them.”—­Bp.  Butler cor. “Success, indeed, no more decides for the right, than a man’s killing of his antagonist in a duel.”—­Campbell cor. “His reminding of them.”—­Kirkham cor. “This mistake was corrected by his preceptor’s causing of him to plant some beans.”—­Id. “Their neglecting of this was ruinous.”—­Frost cor. “That he was serious, appears from his distinguishing of the others as ‘finite.’”—­Felch cor. “His hearers are not at all sensible of his doing of it.”  Or:—­“that he does it.”—­Sheridan cor.

UNDER NOTE III.—­CHANGE THE EXPRESSION.

“An allegory is a fictitious story the meaning of which is figurative, not literal; a double meaning, or dilogy, is the saying of only one thing, when we have two in view.”—­Phil.  Mu. cor. “A verb may generally be distinguished by the sense which it makes with any of the personal pronouns, or with the word TO, before it.”—­Murray et al. cor. “A noun may in general be distinguished by the article which comes before it, or by the sense which it makes of itself.”—­Merchant et al. cor. “An adjective may usually be known by the sense which it makes with the word thing; as, a good thing, a bad thing.”—­Iid. “It is seen to be in the objective case, because it denotes the object affected by the act of leaving.”—­O.  B. Peirce cor. “It is seen to be in the possessive case, because it denotes the possessor of something.”—­Id. “The noun MAN is caused by the adjective WHATEVER to seem like a twofold nominative, as if it denoted, of itself, one person as the subject of the two remarks.”—­Id. “WHEN, as used in the last line, is a connective, because it joins that line to the other part of the sentence.”—­Id. “Because they denote reciprocation.”—­Id. “To allow them to make use of that liberty;”—­“To allow them to use that liberty;”—­or, “To allow them that liberty.”—­Sale