OBS. 1.—­Respecting the syntax of the infinitive mood when the particle to is not expressed before it, our grammarians are almost as much at variance, as I have shown them to be, when they find the particle employed.  Concerning verbs governed by verbs, Lindley Murray, and some others, are the most clear and positive, where their doctrine is the most obviously wrong; and, where they might have affirmed with truth, that the former verb governs the latter, they only tell us that “the preposition TO is sometimes properly omitted,”—­or that such and such verbs “have commonly other verbs following them without the sign TO.”—­Murray’s Gram., p. 183; Alger’s, 63; W.  Allen’s, 167, and others.  If these authors meant, that the preposition to is omitted by ellipsis, they ought to have said so.  Then the many admirers and remodellers of Murray’s Grammar might at least have understood him alike.  Then, too, any proper definition of ellipsis must have proved both them and him to be clearly wrong about this construction also.  If the word to is really “understood,” whenever it is omitted after bid, dare, feel, &c., as some authors, affirm, then is it here the governing word, if anywhere; and this nineteenth rule, however common, is useless to the parser.[414] Then, too, does no English verb ever govern the infinitive without governing also a preposition, “expressed or understood.”  Whatever is omitted by ellipsis, and truly “understood,” really belongs to the grammatical construction; and therefore, if inserted, it cannot be actually improper, though it may be unnecessary.  But all our grammarians admit, that to before the infinitive is sometimes “superfluous and improper.”—­Murray’s Gram., p. 183.  I imagine, there cannot be any proper ellipsis of to before the infinitive, except in some forms of comparison; because, wherever else it is necessary, either to the sense or to the construction, it ought to be inserted.  And wherever the to is rightly used, it is properly the governing word; but where it cannot be inserted without impropriety, it is absurd to say, that it is “understood.”  The infinitive that is put after such a verb or participle as excludes the preposition to, is governed by this verb or participle, if it is governed by any thing:  as,

   “To make them do, undo, eat, drink, stand, move,
    Talk, think, and feel, exactly as he chose.”—­Pollok, p. 69.

OBS. 2.—­Ingersoll, who converted Murray’s Grammar into “Conversations,” says, “I will just remark to you that the verbs in the infinitive mood, that follow make, need, see, bid, dare, feel, hear, let, and their participles, are always GOVERNED by them.”—­Conv. on Eng.  Gram., p. 120.  Kirkham, who pretended to turn the same book into “Familiar Lectures,” says, “To, the sign