11. Reign of George IV, 1830 back to 1820.—­Example written in 1827.

   “That morning, thou, that slumbered[48] not before,
    Nor slept, great Ocean I laid thy waves to rest,
    And hushed thy mighty minstrelsy.  No breath
    Thy deep composure stirred, no fin, no oar;
    Like beauty newly dead, so calm, so still,
    So lovely, thou, beneath the light that fell
    From angel-chariots sentinelled on high,
    Reposed, and listened, and saw thy living change,
    Thy dead arise.  Charybdis listened, and Scylla;
    And savage Euxine on the Thracian beach
    Lay motionless:  and every battle ship
    Stood still; and every ship of merchandise,
    And all that sailed, of every name, stood still.” 
                  ROBERT POLLOK:  Course of Time, Book VII, line 634-647.

II.  ENGLISH OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.

12. Reign of George III, 1820 back to 1760.—­Example written in 1800.

“There is, it will be confessed, a delicate sensibility to character, a sober desire of reputation, a wish to possess the esteem of the wise and good, felt by the purest minds, which is at the farthest remove from arrogance or vanity.  The humility of a noble mind scarcely dares approve of itself, until it has secured the approbation of others.  Very different is that restless desire of distinction, that passion for theatrical display, which inflames the heart and occupies the whole attention of vain men. * * * The truly good man is jealous over himself, lest the notoriety of his best actions, by blending itself with their motive, should diminish their value; the vain man performs the same actions for the sake of that notoriety.  The good man quietly discharges his duty, and shuns ostentation; the vain man considers every good deed lost that is not publickly displayed.  The one is intent upon realities, the other upon semblances:  the one aims to be virtuous, the other to appear so.”—­ROBERT HALL:  Sermon on Modern Infidelity.

13. From Washington’s Farewell Address.—­Example written in 1796.

“Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and Morality are indispensable supports.  In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labour to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens.  The mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and cherish them.  A volume could not trace all their connexions with private and publick felicity.  Let it simply be asked, where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice?  And let us with caution indulge the supposition, that morality can be maintained without religion.  Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of a peculiar structure; reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.”—­GEORGE WASHINGTON.