only can appreciate.  “Will the greatest Mastership in Greek and Latin, or [the] translating [of] these Languages into English, avail for the Purpose of acquiring an elegant English Style?  No—­we know just the Reverse from woeful Experience!  And, as Mr. Locke and the Spectator observe, Men who have threshed hard at Greek and Latin for ten or eleven years together, are very often deficient in their own Language.”—­Preface to the British Gram., 8vo, 1784, p. xxi.

23.  That the progress of English literature in early times was slow, will not seem wonderful to those who consider what is affirmed of the progress of other arts, more immediately connected with the comforts of life.  “Down to the reign of Elizabeth, the greater part of the houses in considerable towns, had no chimneys:  the fire was kindled against the wall, and the smoke found its way out as well as it could, by the roof, the door, or the windows.  The houses were mostly built of wattling, plastered over with clay; and the beds were only straw pallets, with a log of wood for a pillow.  In this respect, even the king fared no better than his subjects; for, in Henry the Eighth’s time, we find directions, ’to examine every night the straw of the king’s bed, that no daggers might be concealed therein.’  A writer in 1577, speaking of the progress of luxury, mentions three things especially, that were ’marvellously altered for the worse in England;’ the multitude of chimneys lately erected, the increase of lodgings, and the exchange of treen platters into pewter, and wooden spoons into silver and tin; and he complains bitterly that oak instead of willow was employed in the building of houses.”—­REV.  ROYAL ROBBINS:  Outlines of History, p. 377.

24.  Shakspeare appeared in the reign of Elizabeth; outlived her thirteen years; and died in 1616 aged 52.  The English language in his hands did not lack power or compass of expression.  His writings are now more extensively read, than any others of that age; nor has any very considerable part of his phraseology yet become obsolete.  But it ought to be known, that the printers or editors of the editions which are now read, have taken extensive liberty in modernizing his orthography, as well as that of other old authors still popular.  How far such liberty is justifiable, it is difficult to say.  Modern readers doubtless find a convenience in it.  It is very desirable that the orthography of our language should be made uniform, and remain permanent.  Great alterations cannot be suddenly introduced; and there is, in stability, an advantage which will counterbalance that of a slow approximation to regularity.  Analogy may sometimes decide the form of variable words, but the concurrent usage of the learned must ever be respected, in this, as in every other part of grammar.