ordinary hearer can without difficulty finish the
sentence. Christ was not afraid of a paradox.
When,
e.g., He said, “Whosoever smiteth
thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also,”
He was ready to risk the possibility of being misunderstood
by some prosaic hearer, that He might the more effectually
arouse men to a neglected duty. His language
was concrete, not abstract; He taught by example and
illustration; He thought, and taught others to think,
in pictures. How often is the phrase, “The
kingdom of heaven is like unto——”
on His lips! Moreover, His illustrations were
always such as common folk could best appreciate.
The birds of the air, the lilies of the field, the
lamp on the lamp-stand, the hen with her chickens under
her wings, the servant following the plough, the shepherd
tending his sheep, the fisherman drawing his net,
the sower casting his seed into the furrow, the housewife
baking her bread or sweeping her house,—it
was through panes of common window-glass like these
that Christ let in the light upon the heaped-up treasures
of the kingdom of God. No wonder “the common
people heard Him gladly”; no wonder they “all
hung upon Him listening”; or that they “came
early in the morning to Him in the temple to hear
Him”! Yet, even in the eyes of the multitude
the plain homespun of Christ’s speech was shot
with gleams of more than earthly lustre. There
mingled—to use another figure—with
the sweet music of those simple sayings a new deep
note their ears had never heard before: “the
multitudes were astonished at His teaching; for He
taught them as one having authority, and not as their
scribes.” It was not the authority of powerful
reasoning over the intellect, reasoning which we cannot
choose but obey; it was the authority of perfect spiritual
intuition. Christ never speaks as one giving
the results of long and painful gropings after truth,
but rather as one who is at home in the world to which
God and the things of the spirit belong. He asserts
that which He knows, He declares that which He has
seen.
(3) Another quality of Christ’s words which
helps us to understand their world-wide influence
is their winnowedness, their freedom from the chaff
which, in the words of others, mingles with the wholesome
grain. The attempt is sometimes made to destroy,
or, at least, to weaken, our claim for Christ as the
supreme teacher by placing a few selected sayings of
His side by side with the words of some other ancient
thinker or teacher. And if they who make such
comparisons would put into their parallel columns
all the words of Jesus and all the words of those with
whom the comparison is made, we should have neither
right to complain nor reason to fear. Wellhausen
puts the truth very neatly when he says, “The
Jewish scholars say, ’All that Jesus said is
also to be found in the Talmud.’ Yes, all,
and a great deal besides."[7] The late Professor G.J.
Romanes has pointed out the contrast in two respects
between Christ and Plato. He speaks of Plato