of ears and nostrils that explore a broad belt of air;
it is also to become the occupier of every bit of vantage
ground whence the approach of a wild beast might be
overlooked. The protective senses of each individual
who chooses to live in companionship are multiplied
by a large factor, and he thereby receives a maximum
of security at a minimum cost of restlessness.
When we isolate an animal who has been accustomed to
a gregarious life, we take away his sense of protection,
for he feels himself exposed to danger from every
part of the circle around him, except the one point
on which his attention is momentarily fixed; and he
knows that disaster may easily creep up to him from
behind. Consequently his glance is restless and
anxious, and is turned in succession to different
quarters; his movements are hurried and agitated,
and he becomes a prey to the extremest terror.
There can be no room for doubt that it is suitable
to the well-being of cattle in a country infested
with beasts of prey to live in close companionship,
and being suitable, it follows from the law of natural
selection that the development of gregarious and therefore
of slavish instincts must be favoured in such cattle.
It also follows from the same law that the degree
in which those instincts are developed is on the whole
the most conducive to their safety. If they were
more gregarious they would crowd so closely as to
interfere with each other when grazing the scattered
pasture of Damara land; if less gregarious, they would
be too widely scattered to keep a sufficient watch
against the wild beasts.
I now proceed to consider more particularly why the
range of deviation from the average is such that we
find about one ox out of fifty to possess sufficient
independence of character to serve as a pretty good
fore-ox. Why is it not one in five or one in five
hundred? The reason undoubtedly is that natural
selection tends to give but one leader to each suitably-sized
herd, and to repress superabundant leaders. There
is a certain size of herd most suitable to the geographical
and other conditions of the country; it must not be
too large, or the scattered puddles which form their
only watering-places for a great part of the year
would not suffice; and there are similar drawbacks
in respect to pasture. It must not be too small,
or it would be comparatively insecure; thus a troop
of five animals is far more easy to be approached
by a stalking huntsman than one of twenty, and the
latter than one of a hundred. We have seen that
it is the oxen who graze apart, as well as those who
lead the herd, who are recognised by the trainers of
cattle as gifted with enough independence of character
to become fore-oxen. They are even preferred
to the actual leaders of the herd; they dare to move
more alone, and therefore their independence is undoubted.
The leaders are safe enough from lions, because their
flanks and rear are guarded by their followers; but
each of those who graze apart, and who represent the