genuine and purely popular movement that we have had since the Chartists has been the enlistment for this war.  By all means say that such vague and sentimental volunteering is valueless in war if you think so; or even if you don’t think so.  By all means say that Germany is unconquerable and that we cannot really kill you.  But if you say that we do not really want to kill you, you do us an injustice.  You do indeed.

I need not consider the yet crazier things that some of you have said; as that the English intend to keep Calais and fight France as well as Germany for the privilege of purchasing a frontier and the need to keep a conscript army.  That, also, is out of books, and pretty mouldy old books at that.  It was said, I suppose, to gain sympathy among the French, and is therefore not my immediate business, as they are eminently capable of looking after themselves.  I merely drop one word in passing, lest you waste your powerful intellect on such projects.  The English may some day forgive you; the French never will.  You Teutons are too light and fickle to understand the Latin seriousness.  My only concern is to point out that about England, at least, you are invariably and miraculously wrong.

Now speaking seriously, my dear Professor, it will not do.  It could be easy to fence with you for ever and parry every point you attempt to make, until English people began to think there was nothing wrong with England at all.  But I refuse to play for safety in this way.  There is a very great deal that is really wrong with England, and it ought not to be forgotten even in the full blaze of your marvellous mistakes.  I cannot have my countrymen tempted to those pleasures of intellectual pride which are the result of comparing themselves with you.  The deep collapse and yawning chasm of your ineptitude leaves me upon a perilous spiritual elevation.  Your mistakes are matters of fact; but to enumerate them does not exhaust the truth.  For instance, the learned man who rendered the phrase in an English advertisement “cut you dead” as “hack you to death,” was in error; but to say that many such advertisements are vulgar is not an error.  Again, it is true that the English poor are harried and insecure, with insufficient instinct for armed revolt, though you will be wrong if you say that they are occupied literally in shooting the moon.  It is true that the average Englishman is too much attracted by aristocratic society; though you will be in error if you quote dining with Duke Humphrey as an example of it.  In more ways than one you forget what is meant by idiom.