proposed by Darwin as final I have reason to believe,
from the fact that, the last time I saw him, he assured
me that he was confident that if he could have seen
Agassiz again before he died he could have persuaded
him that evolution was the solution of the problem
of creation, though knowing that Agassiz could never
have accepted the doctrine of natural selection in
its bareness, absolutely convinced as he was of the
agency of Conscious Mind in creation. And I had
the further declaration of Owen himself in his expressed
conviction that the process of evolution was directed
by the Divine Intelligence. One statement he
made struck me forcibly in this connection,
viz.:
that he believed that the evolution of the horse reached
its culmination synchronously with the evolution of
man, and that the agreement was a part of the divine
plan, while Darwin refuses to admit a plan in creation.
I have heard amongst evolutionists much bitterness
expressed concerning Owen for what they considered
his yielding to the pressure of public opinion, and
adopting the theory of evolution in contradiction
to his real convictions; but I saw enough of him to
be certain that he really believed in evolution subject
to the dominance of the Divine Intelligence, nor did
any of the accusations I heard against him persuade
me of the least insincerity in his acceptance of the
theory with that qualification,—a position,
I am convinced, held by many, even then, who did not
openly support it, not caring to go counter to the
very general advocacy of natural selection.
The teaching of Owen completed my conversion to the
theory of evolution as a general law, not on grounds
of physical science, the demonstration by which is
and must remain forever incomplete, but on the philosophical
ground, which I was more capable of measuring; and
with the acceptance of evolution disappeared, logically
and, in the subsequent years, completely, the influence
of the old anthropomorphic religion, with its terrible
dogmas of the inheritance of Adam’s transgression
and an angry God with His vicarious punishment of His
only son, with all the puzzles of miraculous intervention
and the perplexities of an infallible revealed word
which continually contradicts itself. The conception
of Deity thus liberated from the fetters of a materialistic
faith rose to a dignity I had never before comprehended,
and brought me the new perception of a spiritual religion
and life, which was more consoling and vivifying by
far than the old belief.
It is possible that the impressions of that time have
been modified by my subsequent intercourse with scientific
men in England; but they are that the very wide and
rapid acceptance of the theory of evolution by natural
selection was largely due to the relief it offered
from the incubus of the old theological conception
of the Deity as a personal agency, always interfering
with the course of events,—an infinite,
omnipotent, and omniscient stage manager,—a