The American observer of 1829-41 would have seen, too, in the Workingmen’s party, and in other similar organizations, only sections of the Democratic party.  They were the light troops of the grand army of Democracy, the velites who skirmished in front of the legions.  They never controlled the Democratic party; but it is undeniable that they did color its policy, and give a certain tone to its sentiment, at a very important period of American history.  The success of President Jackson, in that political contest which is known as “the Bank War,” was entirely owing to the support which he received from the workingmen of some two or three States; and it is quite probable that the shrewd men who then managed the Democratic party were induced to enter upon that war by their knowledge of the exalted condition of political opinion in those States.  For their own purposes, they turned to account sentiments that might have worked dangerously, if they had not been directed against the Bank.  One effect of this was, that the Democratic party was compelled to make use of more popular language, which caused it to lose some of its influential members, who were easily alarmed by words, though they had borne philosophically with violent things.  For five years after the veto of the Bank Bill, in 1832, the Democratic party was essentially radical in its tone, without doing much of a radical character.  In 1837, the monetary troubles came to a head, and then it was seen how little reliance could be placed on men who were supposed to be attached to extreme popular opinions.  It was in the very States which were thought to abound with radicals that the Democracy lost ground, and the way was prepared for their entire overthrow in the memorable year 1840.  That year saw American politics debauched, and from that time we find no radical element in any of our parties.  The contest was so intense, that the two parties swallowed and digested all lesser factions.  Since then, a variety of causes have combined to prevent the development of what is termed Agrarianism.  The struggle of the Democracy to regain power; the Mexican war, and the extension of our dominion, consequent on that war, bringing up again, in full force, the slavery question; and the discovery of gold in California, which led myriads of energetic men to a remote quarter of the nation;—­these are the principal causes of the freedom of our later party-struggles from radical theories.  From radical practices we have always been free, and it is improbable that our country will know them for generations.

The origin of the word Agrarianism, as an obnoxious political term, is somewhat curious.  It is one of the items of our inheritance from the Romans, to whom we owe so much, both of good and evil, in politics and in law.