It is not in any such spirit of facile and reckless reassurance that we should approach the really difficult problem of the delicate virtues and the deep dangers of our two historic seats of learning.  A good son does not easily admit that his sick mother is dying; but neither does a good son cheerily assert that she is “all right.”  There are many good arguments for leaving the two historic Universities exactly as they are.  There are many good arguments for smashing them or altering them entirely.  But in either case the plain truth told by the Bishop of Birmingham remains.  If these Universities were destroyed, they would not be destroyed as Universities.  If they are preserved, they will not be preserved as Universities.  They will be preserved strictly and literally as playgrounds; places valued for their hours of leisure more than for their hours of work.  I do not say that this is unreasonable; as a matter of private temperament I find it attractive.  It is not only possible to say a great deal in praise of play; it is really possible to say the highest things in praise of it.  It might reasonably be maintained that the true object of all human life is play.  Earth is a task garden; heaven is a playground.  To be at last in such secure innocence that one can juggle with the universe and the stars, to be so good that one can treat everything as a joke—­that may be, perhaps, the real end and final holiday of human souls.  When we are really holy we may regard the Universe as a lark; so perhaps it is not essentially wrong to regard the University as a lark.  But the plain and present fact is that our upper classes do regard the University as a lark, and do not regard it as a University.  It also happens very often that through some oversight they neglect to provide themselves with that extreme degree of holiness which I have postulated as a necessary preliminary to such indulgence in the higher frivolity.

Humanity, always dreaming of a happy race, free, fantastic, and at ease, has sometimes pictured them in some mystical island, sometimes in some celestial city, sometimes as fairies, gods, or citizens of Atlantis.  But one method in which it has often indulged is to picture them as aristocrats, as a special human class that could actually be seen hunting in the woods or driving about the streets.  And this never was (as some silly Germans say) a worship of pride and scorn; mankind never really admired pride; mankind never had any thing but a scorn for scorn.  It was a worship of the spectacle of happiness; especially of the spectacle of youth.  This is what the old Universities in their noblest aspect really are; and this is why there is always something to be said for keeping them as they are.  Aristocracy is not a tyranny; it is not even merely a spell.  It is a vision.  It is a deliberate indulgence in a certain picture of pleasure painted for the purpose; every Duchess is (in an innocent sense) painted, like Gainsborough’s