You may want to jump or to play cards; but you do not want to read wandering statements to the effect that jumping is jumping, or that games are won by winners.  If these writers, for instance, said anything about success in jumping it would be something like this:  “The jumper must have a clear aim before him.  He must desire definitely to jump higher than the other men who are in for the same competition.  He must let no feeble feelings of mercy (sneaked from the sickening Little Englanders and Pro-Boers) prevent him from trying to do his best.  He must remember that a competition in jumping is distinctly competitive, and that, as Darwin has gloriously demonstrated, THE WEAKEST GO TO THE WALL.”  That is the kind of thing the book would say, and very useful it would be, no doubt, if read out in a low and tense voice to a young man just about to take the high jump.  Or suppose that in the course of his intellectual rambles the philosopher of Success dropped upon our other case, that of playing cards, his bracing advice would run—­“In playing cards it is very necessary to avoid the mistake (commonly made by maudlin humanitarians and Free Traders) of permitting your opponent to win the game.  You must have grit and snap and go in to win.  The days of idealism and superstition are over.  We live in a time of science and hard common sense, and it has now been definitely proved that in any game where two are playing IF ONE DOES NOT WIN THE OTHER WILL.”  It is all very stirring, of course; but I confess that if I were playing cards I would rather have some decent little book which told me the rules of the game.  Beyond the rules of the game it is all a question either of talent or dishonesty; and I will undertake to provide either one or the other—­which, it is not for me to say.

Turning over a popular magazine, I find a queer and amusing example.  There is an article called “The Instinct that Makes People Rich.”  It is decorated in front with a formidable portrait of Lord Rothschild.  There are many definite methods, honest and dishonest, which make people rich; the only “instinct” I know of which does it is that instinct which theological Christianity crudely describes as “the sin of avarice.”  That, however, is beside the present point.  I wish to quote the following exquisite paragraphs as a piece of typical advice as to how to succeed.  It is so practical; it leaves so little doubt about what should be our next step—­“The name of Vanderbilt is synonymous with wealth gained by modern enterprise.  ‘Cornelius,’ the founder of the family, was the first of the great American magnates of commerce.  He started as the son of a poor farmer; he ended as a millionaire twenty times over.”

“He had the money-making instinct.  He seized his opportunities, the opportunities that were given by the application of the steam-engine to ocean traffic, and by the birth of railway locomotion in the wealthy but undeveloped United States of America, and consequently he amassed an immense fortune.