is generally done by Irish laborers who travel about the country under contractors or are engaged by resident gangsmen for the task.  Mr. Seal lamented the high prices of this work; but then, as he said, ’It was much better to have Irish do it, who cost nothing to the planter if they died, than to use up good field-hands in such severe employment,’” Russell added on his own score:  “There is a wonderful mine of truth in this observation.  Heaven knows how many poor Hibernians have been consumed and buried in these Louisianian swamps, leaving their earnings to the dramshop keeper and the contractor, and the results of their toil to the planter.”  On another plantation the same traveller was shown the debris left by the last Irish gang and was regaled by an account of the methods by which their contractor made them work.[31] Robert Russell made a similar observation on a plantation near New Orleans, and was told that even at high wages Irish laborers were advisable for the work because they would do twice as much ditching as would an equal number of negroes in the same time.[32] Furthermore, A. de Puy Van Buren, noted as a common sight in the Yazoo district, “especially in the ditching season, wandering ‘exiles of Erin,’ straggling along the road”; and remarked also that the Irish were the chief element among the straining roustabouts, on the steamboats of that day.[33] Likewise Olmsted noted on the Alabama River that in lading his boat with cotton from a towering bluff, a slave squad was appointed for the work at the top of the chute, while Irish deck hands were kept below to capture the wildly bounding bales and stow them.  As to the reason for this division of labor and concentration of risk, the traveller had his own surmise confirmed when the captain answered his question by saying, “The niggers are worth too much to be risked here; if the Paddies are knocked overboard, or get their backs broke, nobody loses anything!"[34] To these chance observations it may be added that many newspaper items and canal and railroad company reports from the ’thirties to the ’fifties record that the construction gangs were largely of Irish and Germans.  The pay attracted those whose labor was their life; the risk repelled those whose labor was their capital.  There can be no doubt that the planters cherished the lives of their slaves.

[Footnote 27:  Edward J. Forstall, The Agricultural Productions of Louisiana (New Orleans, 1845).]

[Footnote 28:  Harper’s Magazine, VII, 755.]

[Footnote 29:  DeBoufs Review, XI, 401.]

[Footnote 30:  Olmsted, Seaboard Slave States, pp. 90, 91.]

[Footnote 31:  W.H.  Russell, My Diary North and South (Boston, 1863), pp 272, 273, 278.]

[Footnote 32:  Robert Russell, North America, Its Agriculture and Chwate (Edinburgh, 1857), p. 272.]

[Footnote 33:  A. de Puy Van Buren, Jottings of a Year’s Sojourn in the South (Battle Creek, Mich., 1859), pp. 84, 318.]