“The titles of the individuals, thus liberated, to their freedom, were variously derived.  Sometimes from deeds of manumission, long suppressed, and at last brought to light, by the searching scrutiny of Tyson—­sometimes from the genealogy of the petitioner, traced by him to some Indian or white maternal ancestor—­sometimes from the right to freedom, claimed by birth, but attempted to be destroyed by the rapacity of some vile kidnapper, and sometimes from the violation of those of our laws which manumitted slaves imported from foreign parts.

“The labors of Mr. Tyson, were not confined to a single district—­they extended over the whole of Maryland.  There is not a county in it, which has not felt his influence, or a court of justice, whose records do not bear proud testimonials of his triumphs over tyranny.  Throwing out of calculation the many liberations indirectly resulting from his efforts, we speak more than barely within bounds, when we say, that he has been the means, under Providence, of rescuing at least two thousand human beings from the galling yoke of a slavery, which, but for him, would have been perpetual.

“And here let me join my readers in expressions of wonder and astonishment at this extraordinary display of human benevolence, in the person of a single individual—­unsupported by power, wealth, or title, beneath the frowns of society, and against a torrent of prejudice.”

In the year 1789 an “Abolition Society,” (see antecedent pages 23 and 24,) was formed in Baltimore, of which Elisha Tyson was a member until its dissolution, seven years afterwards.

“From that time, Mr. Tyson supported alone the cause of emancipation in Maryland.  Alone, I mean, as the sole director and prime mover of the machinery by which that cause was maintained.  Assisted, he was, no doubt, from time to time; but that assistance was procured through his influence, or rendered effectual under his inspection and advice.[A]

[Footnote A:  “One of the most active assistants was his brother Jesse, much younger than Elisha.  He followed him to this State a few years after the arrival of the latter, was an active member of the Abolition Society, and continued, to the day of his death, to co-operate with Elisha.”]

“The slave traffic gave rise to an evil still greater—­I mean the crime of kidnapping.  If the horrors arising from the first were so great as I have described them, how shall I depict those of the other!  Slaves only were the victims of the slave trade.  In passing from hand to hand, they merely exchanged one condition of slavery for another.  And though on such occasions they fell from a less degree of misery into a greater, they could not number among their privations any thing so bitter as the loss of liberty.  It was this that made the difference between them and the victims of the kidnapper; not that they laid their hands exclusively upon