Miss Anthony’s reply to Mr. Vincent, under date February 3, 1869, published in the New York Sun, and reprinted in the Revolution, is very touching, showing clearly enough that in her eagerness to supply the needed thorough trade-training for young girls, she had for the moment forgotten what was likely to be the outcome for the girls themselves of training, however good, obtained in such a fashion.  She had also forgotten how essential it was that she should work in harmony with the men’s organizations as long as they were willing to work with her.  Though not saying so in so many words, the letter is a shocked avowal that, acting impulsively, she had not comprehended the drift of her action, and it amounts to a withdrawal from her first position.  She writes: 

Sir:  You fail to see my motive in appealing to the Astor House meeting of employers, for aid to establish a training school for girls.  It was to open the way for a thorough drill to the hundreds of poor girls, to fit them to earn equal wages with men everywhere and not to undermine “Typographical No. 6.”  I did not mean to convey the impression that “women, already good compositors should work for a cent less per thousand ems than men,” and I rejoice most heartily that Typographical Union No. 6 stands so nobly by the Women’s Typographical Union No. 1 and demands the admission of women to all offices under its control, and I rejoice also that the Women’s Union No. 1 stands so nobly and generously by Typographical Union No. 6 in refusing most advantageous offers to defeat its demands.

    My advice to all the women compositors of the city, is now, as it
    has ever been since last autumn, to join the women’s union, for in
    union alone there is strength, in union alone there is protection.

Every one should scorn to allow herself to be made a tool to undermine the just prices of men workers; and to avoid this union is necessary.  Hence I say, girls, stand by each other, and by the men, when they stand by you.

With this the incident seems to have closed, for nothing more is heard of the employers’ training-school.[A]

[Footnote A:  This illustrates well the cruel alternative perpetually placed before the working-woman and the working-woman’s friends.  She is afforded little opportunity to learn a trade thoroughly, and yet, if she does not stand by her fellow men workers, she is false to working class loyalty.

That the women printers of New York were between the devil and the deep sea is evidenced by the whole story told in Chapter XXI of “New York Typographical Union No. 6,” by George Stevens.  In that is related how about this time was formed a women printers’ union, styled “Women’s Typographical No. 1,” through the exertions of a number of women compositors with Augusta Lewis at their head.  Miss Lewis voiced the enthusiastic thanks of the women when, a few months later, the union received its charter from the International Typographical Union at its next convention in June, 1869.  A different, and a sadder note runs through Miss Lewis’s report to the convention in Baltimore in 1871, in describing the difficulties the women labored under.