“I am glad to say that, so far as I can see, Mrs. Besant has been kind and affectionate in her conduct and behavior towards the child, and has taken the greatest possible care of her so far as regards her physical welfare.  I have no doubt she entertains that sincere affection for the child which a mother should always feel, and which no merely speculative opinions can materially affect.  But, unfortunately, since her separation from her husband, Mrs. Besant has taken upon herself not merely to ignore religion, not merely to believe in no religion, but to publish and avow that non-belief—­to become the publisher of pamphlets written by herself, and to deliver lectures composed by herself, stating her disbelief in religion altogether, and stating that she has no belief in the existence of a providence or a God.  She has endeavored to convince others, by her lectures and by her pamphlets, that the denial of all religion is a right and proper thing to recommend to mankind at large.  It is not necessary for me to express any opinion as to the religious convictions of any one, or even as to their non-religious convictions.  But I must, as a man of the world, consider what effect on a woman’s position this course of conduct must lead to.  I know, and must know as a man of the world, that her course of conduct must quite cut her off, practically, not merely from the sympathy of, but from social intercourse with, the great majority of her sex.  I do not believe a single clergyman’s wife in England living with her husband would approve of such conduct, or associate with Mrs. Besant; and I must take that into consideration in considering what effect it would have upon the child if brought up by a woman of such reputation.  But the matter does not stop there.  Not only does Mrs. Besant entertain those opinions which are reprobated by the great mass of mankind—­whether rightly or wrongly I have no business to say, though I, of course, think rightly—­but she carries those speculative opinions into practice as regards the education of the child, and from the moment she does that she brings herself within the lines of the decisions of Lord Chancellors and eminent judges with reference to the custody of children by persons holding speculative opinions, and in those cases it has been held that before giving the custody of a child to those who entertain such speculative opinions the Court must consider what effect infusing those opinions as part of its practical education would have upon the child.  That is undoubtedly a matter of the greatest importance.  Upon this point there is no conflict of testimony whatever.  Mrs. Besant herself says that she prohibited the governess from giving any religious education to the child, and has prevented the child from obtaining any religious education at all.  When the child went to school—­ a day school, as I understand—­Mrs. Besant prohibited the governess of that school from imparting any religious education, in the same way that she