In the year 1745 Charles Edward Stuart landed in the wilds of Moidart and set up the standard of rebellion.  The Kingdom of Scotland was then, in nearly all but political rights, an independent nation.  A very large part of its population was of different blood from that of the southern portion of the British Island.  The Highland clans were as distinct in manners, disposition, and race from their English neighbors as are the Indian tribes remaining in our midst from the men of Massachusetts and New York.  They held to the old religion, the cardinal principle of which is to admit the right of no other form, and which never has obtained the upper hand without immediately attempting to put down all rivalry.  They were devotedly attached to their chiefs.  They represented a patriarchal system.  They lived by means of a little agriculture and a great deal of plunder.  They were bred to arms, and despised every other calling.  The whole country of Scotland was possessed with an inextinguishable spirit of nationality, stronger than that of Hungary or Poland.  They were traditional allies of France, the hereditary foe of England.  Seven hundred years of fighting had filled the border-land with battle-fields, some of glorious and some of mournful memory, on which the Cross of Saint Andrew had been matched against that of Saint George.  Some of the noblest families of the realm had won their knightly spurs and their ancient earldoms by warlike prowess against the Southron.  Flodden and Bannockburn were household words, as potent as Agincourt and Cressy.  Nor had the conduct of the House of Hanover been such as to conciliate the unwilling people.  There was known to be a widespread disaffection even in England to the German princes.  These had governed their adopted for the benefit of their native country.  The sentiment of many counties was thoroughly Jacobite.  A corrupt and venal administration was filled with secret adherents of the king over the water.  One great university was in sympathy with the fallen dynasty.  A large part of the Church was imbued with doctrines of divine right and passive obedience, of which the only logical conclusion was the return of the Stuarts.

Between the two countries there was an antagonism of customs, of manners, of character, more marked, more offensively displayed, and breeding more rancorous hatred than any which can now exist between the people of Boston and Charleston, between the Knickerbockers of New York and the Creoles of New Orleans.  A Scotchman was to the South a comprehensive name for a greedy, beggarly adventurer, knavish and money-loving to the last degree, full of absurd pride of pedigree, clannish and cold-blooded, vindictive as a Corsican, and treacherous as a modern Greek.  An Englishman was to the North a bullying, arrogant coward,—­purse-proud, yet cringing to rank,—­without loyalty and without sentiment,—­given over to mere material interests, not comprehending the idea of honor, and believing, as the fortieth of his religious articles, that any injury, even to a blow, could be compensated by money.